Outcomes of Surgical Management of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Perspective.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To provide a summary of the relevant evidence on outcomes of transaxillary first rib excision (TAFRE), supraclavicular first rib excision with scalenectomy (SCFRE), and supraclavicular release leaving the first rib intact (SCR) for patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), and interpret the treatment effects from a Bayesian perspective. METHODS: A systematic literature search and review were performed. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate success rate and complete relief rate of each procedure. The probabilities of specified success rates and complete relief rates were calculated using a Bayesian method. Sensitivity analyses for TOS type, neck trauma, and cervical rib were performed. Complications of each procedure were also reviewed. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 17 studies of TAFRE, 9 of SCFRE, and 14 of SCR to conduct the meta-analyses. The pooled success rate and complete relief rate were 0.76 (95% confidence interval [95% CI)], 0.65-0.85) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.38-0.68) for TAFRE, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68-0.85) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.41-0.72) for SCFRE, and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.92) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.35-0.84) for SCR, respectively. The probabilities of success rate greater than 70% were 90%, 87%, and 99% for TAFRE, SCFRE, and SCR, respectively. If the success rate of 80% or greater was considered, the probabilities were 34%, 31%, and 91%, respectively. The probabilities of complete relief rate of 50% or greater were 67%, 71%, and 69% for TAFRE, SCFRE, and SCR, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. The complication rates for TAFRE, SCFRE, and SCR were, respectively, 22.5%, 25.9%, and 12.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The SCR has a high probability of success rate greater than 80%; both TAFRE and SCFRE have high probabilities of a success rate greater than 70% but only low probabilities of success rate greater than 80%. The TAFRE and SCFRE have more complications than SCR. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic IV.