Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of the Diagnosis of Allergic Reactions in the Emergency Department.
Lacombe-Barrios, J; Gómez, F; Pérez, N; Barrionuevo, E; Doña, I; Fernández Tahía, D; Mayorga, C; Torres, M J; Moreno, E; Bogas, B; Salas, M.
Afiliación
  • Lacombe-Barrios J; Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Malaga, Spain.
  • Gómez F; Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Malaga, Spain.
  • Pérez N; Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Malaga, Spain.
  • Barrionuevo E; Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Malaga, Spain.
  • Doña I; Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Malaga, Spain.
  • Fernández Tahía D; Research Laboratory, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Málaga, Spain.
  • Mayorga C; Research Laboratory, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Málaga, Spain.
  • Torres MJ; BIONAND-Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology.
  • Moreno E; Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Malaga, Spain.
  • Bogas B; Research Laboratory, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga UMA, Málaga, Spain.
  • Salas M; Allergy Unit, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 29(3): 222-230, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30183657
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Suspicion of an acute allergic reaction is a common reason for attending the emergency department (ED). However, there are few comparisons between the initial diagnosis of suspected allergic reaction made in the ED with the definitive diagnosis made subsequently in the allergy department (AD).

Objective:

To compare details of the initial diagnosis made in the ED relating to allergy with the final diagnosis made in the AD.

METHODS:

Patients attending the ED of 2 hospitals with suspected allergic reactions were prospectively enrolled based on key words. A certified allergy specialist reviewed the ED records of these patients and, if these were suggestive of an allergic reaction, the patients were scheduled for further evaluation at the allergy clinic.

RESULTS:

In total, 2000 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and October 2015. Of these, 1333 passed the initial assessment and underwent further evaluation. Of the 1333 patients, 528 underwent an allergological study, and 206 were confirmed as being allergic. With respect to drug allergy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most common triggers, followed by ß-lactams; in food allergy, plant-based foods were the most common. Only 16.4% of patients confirmed as having anaphylaxis in the AD were initially diagnosed with the condition in the ED.

CONCLUSION:

Of the 528 patients who finally underwent the full allergological study, fewer than half were confirmed as allergic. Moreover, anaphylaxis appears to be underdiagnosed in the ED. Better communication between the ED and the AD is necessary to improve the diagnosis and management of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Errores Diagnósticos / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Hipersensibilidad Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Errores Diagnósticos / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Hipersensibilidad Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España