Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preferred learning modalities and practice for critical skills: a global survey of paediatric emergency medicine clinicians.
Craig, Simon S; Auerbach, Marc; Cheek, John Alexander; Babl, Franz E; Oakley, Ed; Nguyen, Lucia; Rao, Arjun; Dalton, Sarah; Lyttle, Mark D; Mintegi, Santiago; Nagler, Joshua; Mistry, Rakesh D; Dixon, Andrew; Rino, Pedro; Kohn-Loncarica, Guillermo; Dalziel, Stuart R.
Afiliación
  • Craig SS; Paediatric Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Auerbach M; School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cheek JA; Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Babl FE; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Oakley E; Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee (PEM-CRC), Itasca, Illinois, USA.
  • Nguyen L; Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Rao A; Emergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Dalton S; Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lyttle MD; Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Mintegi S; Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Nagler J; Emergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Mistry RD; Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Dixon A; Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Rino P; Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kohn-Loncarica G; Emergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Dalziel SR; Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med J ; 36(5): 273-280, 2019 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30327413
OBJECTIVE: To describe senior paediatric emergency clinician perspectives on the optimal frequency of and preferred modalities for practising critical paediatric procedures. METHODS: Multicentre multicountry cross-sectional survey of senior paediatric emergency clinicians working in 96 EDs affiliated with the Pediatric Emergency Research Network. RESULTS: 1332/2446 (54%) clinicians provided information on suggested frequency of practice and preferred learning modalities for 18 critical procedures. Yearly practice was recommended for six procedures (bag valve mask ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask airway insertion, defibrillation/direct current (DC) cardioversion and intraosseous needle insertion) by at least 80% of respondents. 16 procedures were recommended for yearly practice by at least 50% of respondents. Two procedures (venous cutdown and ED thoracotomy) had yearly practice recommended by <40% of respondents. Simulation was the preferred learning modality for CPR, bag valve mask ventilation, DC cardioversion and transcutaneous pacing. Practice in alternative clinical settings (eg, the operating room) was the preferred learning modality for endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask insertion. Use of models/mannequins for isolated procedural training was the preferred learning modality for all other invasive procedures. Free-text responses suggested the utility of cadaver labs and animal labs for more invasive procedures (thoracotomy, intercostal catheter insertion, open surgical airways, venous cutdown and pericardiocentesis). CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric ED clinicians suggest that most paediatric critical procedures should be practised at least annually. The preferred learning modality depends on the skill practised; alternative clinical settings are thought to be most useful for standard airway manoeuvres, while simulation-based experiential learning is applicable for most other procedures.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enseñanza / Educación Médica Continua Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enseñanza / Educación Médica Continua Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia