Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of Anti-Topoisomerase I Antibody Testing by Multiple-Bead, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Immunodiffusion in a University Setting.
Homer, Kate LaRiviere; Warren, Jeffrey; Karayev, Dmitry; Khanna, Puja P; Young, Amber; Nagaraja, Vivek; Metzger, Allan L; Khanna, Dinesh.
Afiliación
  • Homer KL; From the University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan.
  • Warren J; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Karayev D; RDL Reference Laboratory, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Khanna PP; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Metzger AL; RDL Reference Laboratory, Los Angeles, CA.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 26(3): 115-118, 2020 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30585996
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVE:

The criterion standard for anti-topoisomerase I antibody (anti-topo I antibody) testing in systemic sclerosis (SSc) uses immunodiffusion (ID) techniques, but enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and multiple-bead technology are often used in current settings to save time and cost. Our aim was to assess the performance of the multiple-bead assay, ELISA, and ID testing methods.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective study of patients at the University of Michigan whose extractable nuclear antigen 10 autoantibody panel tested positive for the anti-topo I antibody by multiple-bead technology during a 1-year period. All samples positive by multiple-bead assay were sent to the RDL Laboratories and reflexed for ELISA, and all anti-topo I antibodies positive by ELISA were further tested by ID. Clinical data were reviewed by a rheumatologist and assessed for presence of SSc. Data were analyzed via frequency tables.

RESULTS:

Approximately 9500 extractable nuclear antigen 10 panels were ordered by physicians at the University of Michigan. Of these, 129 patients were positive for the anti-topo I antibody by multiple-bead assay, 51 were positive by multiple-bead assay and ELISA, and 21 were positive by multiple-bead assay, ELISA, and ID. We found that 26.4% of patients positive by multiple-bead assay, 47.1% positive by multiple-bead assay and ELISA, and 95.2% positive by multiple-bead assay, ELISA, and ID had SSc.

CONCLUSIONS:

Multiple-bead assays have a high rate of false-positive results for the anti-topo I antibody in patients without clinical evidence of SSc. A stepwise approach of confirmation of positive multiple-bead assay results using both ELISA and ID improves the predictive value of antibody testing for the diagnosis of SSc.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esclerodermia Sistémica / Autoanticuerpos / Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática / Anticuerpos Antinucleares / Inmunodifusión Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Rheumatol Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA / REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esclerodermia Sistémica / Autoanticuerpos / Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática / Anticuerpos Antinucleares / Inmunodifusión Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Rheumatol Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA / REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article