Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation of a telephone classification interview for common chronic headache disorders.
Potter, Rachel; Hee, Siew Wan; Griffiths, Frances; Dodd, Katherine; Hoverd, Eleanor; Underwood, Martin; Matharu, Manjit.
Afiliación
  • Potter R; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. r.potter@warwick.ac.uk.
  • Hee SW; Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
  • Griffiths F; Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
  • Dodd K; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
  • Hoverd E; Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
  • Underwood M; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
  • Matharu M; Headache Group, UCL Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
J Headache Pain ; 20(1): 2, 2019 Jan 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30621592
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For a trial of supportive self-management for people with chronic headache we needed to develop and validate a telephone classification interview that can be used by a non-headache specialist to classify common chronic headache types in primary care. We aimed to specifically exclude secondary headaches other than medication overuse, exclude primary headache disorders other than migraine and tension type headache (TTH), distinguish between chronic migraine and chronic TTH, and identify medication overuse headache.

METHODS:

We held a headache classification consensus conference to draw on evidence and expertise to inform the content of a logic model underpinning the classification interview. Nurses trained to use the logic model did telephone classification interviews with participants recruited from primary care. Doctors specialising in headache did a second validation interview.

RESULTS:

Twenty-six delegates attended the headache classification conference including headache specialist doctors, nurses and lay representatives (with chronic headache). We trained six nurses to do the classification interviews and completed 107 paired interviews, median days between interviews was 32 days (interquartile range 21-48 days). We measured level of agreement between the nurse and doctor interviews using proportion of concordance, simple kappa and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Proportion of concordance of agreement between nurse and doctor interviews was 0.76, simple kappa coefficient κ 0.31 (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.52), and PABAK 0.51 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.68), a moderate agreement. In a sensitivity test following review of headache characteristics recorded, concordance was 0.91, κ = 0.53 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.79), and PABAK = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.92), a very good agreement.

CONCLUSION:

We developed and validated a new evidence-based telephone classification interview that can be used by a non-headache specialist to classify common chronic headache types in primary care.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos de Cefalalgia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Headache Pain Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos de Cefalalgia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Headache Pain Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido