The ethical conundrum: Conflicting advocacy positions in advanced heart failure therapy.
Clin Transplant
; 33(3): e13489, 2019 03.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30689225
ABSTRACT
It is estimated that nearly 6.5 million Americans over the age of 20 suffer from heart failure. Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in patients over 65 years of age, and carries with it a 5-year mortality of nearly 50%. Despite advances in medical therapy, treatment for medically refractory end-stage, advanced heart failure is limited to heart transplant, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), or palliative care only. Patient selection in advanced heart failure (AHF) therapy is complex. Not only are the patients medically complicated, but providers are biased by their individual and collective experience with similar and dissimilar patients. Clinicians caring for AHF patients balance competing clinical and ethical demands, which appropriately leads to professional debate and disagreement. These debates are constructive because they clarify ethical and professional commitments and help to ensure fair and equitable treatment of AHF patients.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Defensa del Paciente
/
Corazón Auxiliar
/
Trasplante de Corazón
/
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
/
Selección de Paciente
/
Insuficiencia Cardíaca
/
Hospitalización
Tipo de estudio:
Guideline
/
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Clin Transplant
Asunto de la revista:
TRANSPLANTE
Año:
2019
Tipo del documento:
Article