Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of Functional Screening Tests and Noncontact Injuries in Division I Women Student-Athletes.
Warren, Meghan; Lininger, Monica R; Smith, Craig A; Copp, Adam J; Chimera, Nicole J.
Afiliación
  • Warren M; Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona.
  • Lininger MR; Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona.
  • Smith CA; Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona.
  • Copp AJ; Smith Performance Center, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Chimera NJ; Advanced Travel Therapy, Rock Springs, Wyoming; and.
J Strength Cond Res ; 34(8): 2302-2311, 2020 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30747899
ABSTRACT
Warren, M, Lininger, M, Smith, CA, Copp, A, and Chimera, NJ. Association of functional screening tests and noncontact injuries in Division I women student-athletes. J Strength Cond Res 34(8) 2302-2311, 2020-To determine the association between functional screening tests and lower-body, noncontact injuries in Division I women basketball, soccer, and volleyball student-athletes (SA). Sixty-eight injury-free women SA (age 19.1 ± 1.1 years, height 171.3 ± 8.7 cm, and mass 68.4 ± 9.5 kg) were tested preseason with single hop (SH), triple hop (TH), and crossover hop (XH) for distance, and isometric hip strength (abduction, extension, and external rotation) in randomized order. The first lower-body (spine and lower extremity), noncontact injury requiring intervention by the athletic trainer was abstracted from the electronic medical record. Receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to determine cut-points for each hopping test from the absolute value of between-limb difference. Body mass-adjusted strength was categorized into tertiles. Logistic regression determined the odds of injury with each functional screening test using the hopping tests cut-points and strength categories, adjusting for previous injury. Fifty-two SA were injured during the sport season. The cut-point for SH was 4 cm (sensitivity = 0.77, specificity = 0.43, and AUC = 0.53), and for TH and XH was 12 cm (sensitivity = 0.75 and 0.67, specificity = 0.71 and 0.57, AUC = 0.59 and 0.41, respectively). A statistically significant association with TH and injuries (adjusted odds ratio = 6.50 [95% confidence interval 1.69-25.04]) was found. No significant overall association was found with SH or XH, nor with the strength tests. Using a clinically relevant injury definition, the TH showed the strongest predictive ability for noncontact injuries. This hopping test may be a clinically useful tool to help identify increased risk of injury in women SA participating in high-risk sports.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos en Atletas / Tamizaje Masivo Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Strength Cond Res Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos en Atletas / Tamizaje Masivo Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Strength Cond Res Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article