Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medicare Incentive Payments to United States Ophthalmologists for Use of Electronic Health Records: 2011-2016.
Boland, Michael V; Hwang, Thomas S; Lim, Michele C; Peterson, Jessica L; Lum, Flora; Lee, Aaron Y.
Afiliación
  • Boland MV; Wilmer Eye Institute and Division of Health Sciences Informatics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: boland@jhu.edu.
  • Hwang TS; Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Lim MC; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.
  • Peterson JL; American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California.
  • Lum F; American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California.
  • Lee AY; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ophthalmology ; 126(7): 928-934, 2019 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30768941
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate ophthalmologists' rate of attestation to meaningful use (MU) of their electronic health record (EHR) systems in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and their continuity and success in receiving payments in comparison with other specialties.

DESIGN:

Administrative database study.

PARTICIPANTS:

Eligible professionals participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program.

METHODS:

Based on publicly available data sources, subsets of payment and attestation data were created for ophthalmologists and for other specialties. The number of eligible professionals attesting was determined using the attestation data for each year and stage of the program. The proportion of attestations by EHR vendor was calculated using all attestations for each vendor. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Numbers of ophthalmologists attesting by year and stage of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, incentive payments, and number of attestations by EHR vendor.

RESULTS:

In the peak year of participation, 51.6% of ophthalmologists successfully attested to MU, compared with 37.1% of optometrists, 50.2% of dermatologists, 54.5% of otolaryngologists, and 64.4% of urologists. Across the 6 years of the program, ophthalmologists received an average of $17 942 in incentive payments compared with $11 105 for optometrists, $16 617 for dermatologists, $20 203 for otolaryngologists, and $23 821 for urologists. Epic and Nextgen were the most frequently used EHRs for attestation by ophthalmologists.

CONCLUSIONS:

Ophthalmology as a specialty performed better than optometry and dermatology, but worse than otolaryngology and urology, in terms of the proportion of eligible professionals attesting to MU of EHRs. Ophthalmologists were more likely to remain in the program after their initial year of attestation compared with all eligible providers. The top 4 EHR vendors accounted for 50% of attestations by ophthalmologists.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicare / Registros Electrónicos de Salud / Oftalmólogos Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicare / Registros Electrónicos de Salud / Oftalmólogos Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article