Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Matching design to use: a task analysis comparison of three cognitive aid designs used during simulated crisis management.
Clebone, Anna; Burian, Barbara K; Tung, Avery.
Afiliación
  • Clebone A; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC4028, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. aclebone@gmail.com.
  • Burian BK; Human Systems Integration Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA, USA.
  • Tung A; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC4028, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Can J Anaesth ; 66(6): 658-671, 2019 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30805904
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Intraoperative critical events typically include vital sign instability that requires a specific and time-sensitive response. Although cognitive aids can improve clinical performance during critical events, their design may not be optimized for real-world use. For example, during a critical event, health practitioners may be familiar with the treatment pathway and only require specific information from an aid-a behaviour described as "sampling". We hypothesized that use of cognitive aids designed to facilitate sampling behaviour would reduce the time required to extract information during simulated critical events.

METHODS:

We designed two experimental cognitive aids, based on cognitive science research on human performance, to facilitate sampling behaviour. Design principles included content clusters that were specifically located, colour-coded and labelled, the elimination of distractors such as numbering, and a key features summary. In a simulated low-fidelity study, we compared the time required for anesthesia care providers to identify and extract specific information from these two experimental cognitive aids and from a traditional step-by-step "linear/control" aid. An eye-tracking device was used to assess how information was accessed from the cognitive aids.

RESULTS:

When all response times were pooled, participants identified and extracted information more quickly using either experimental aid (median [interquartile range] 6.3 [4.0-9.7] sec, P = 0.006 and 4.7 [3.3-6.3] sec, P < 0.001) than the "linear/control" cognitive aid (12.7 [9.3-14.7] sec). Eye-tracking data revealed that participants spent more time looking at the "linear/control" design cognitive aid [mean (standard deviation) 10.9 (7.1) sec] than at either experimental cognitive aid [6.7 (4.6) and 3.8 (2.5) sec, P = 0.020, P < 0.001], respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Cognitive aids designed to enhance sampling behaviour may facilitate rapid retrieval of specific information during crisis management.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cognición / Cuidados Intraoperatorios / Anestesiología Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Can J Anaesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cognición / Cuidados Intraoperatorios / Anestesiología Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Can J Anaesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos