Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer using digital images: a systematic review.
Marka, Arthur; Carter, Joi B; Toto, Ermal; Hassanpour, Saeed.
Afiliación
  • Marka A; Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Box 163, Kellogg Building, 45 Dewey Field Road, Hanover, NH, USA. arthur.marka.med@dartmouth.edu.
  • Carter JB; Section of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
  • Toto E; Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA.
  • Hassanpour S; Department of Computer Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
BMC Med Imaging ; 19(1): 21, 2019 02 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30819133
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Computer-aided diagnosis of skin lesions is a growing area of research, but its application to nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is relatively under-studied. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the research that has been conducted on automated detection of NMSC using digital images and to assess the quality of evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of these technologies.

METHODS:

Eight databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and the ACM Digital Library) were searched to identify diagnostic studies of NMSC using image-based machine learning models. Two reviewers independently screened eligible articles. The level of evidence of each study was evaluated using a five tier rating system, and the applicability and risk of bias of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.

RESULTS:

Thirty-nine studies were reviewed. Twenty-four models were designed to detect basal cell carcinoma, two were designed to detect squamous cell carcinoma, and thirteen were designed to detect both. All studies were conducted in silico. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the classifiers, defined as concordance with histopathologic diagnosis, was high, with reported accuracies ranging from 72 to 100% and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.832 to 1. Most studies had substantial methodological limitations, but several were robustly designed and presented a high level of evidence.

CONCLUSION:

Most studies of image-based NMSC classifiers report performance greater than or equal to the reported diagnostic accuracy of the average dermatologist, but relatively few studies have presented a high level of evidence. Clinical studies are needed to assess whether these technologies can feasibly be implemented as a real-time aid for clinical diagnosis of NMSC.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Carcinoma Basocelular / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Diagnóstico por Computador Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Carcinoma Basocelular / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Diagnóstico por Computador Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos