Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research.
Dyke, Stephanie O M; Saulnier, Katie M; Dupras, Charles; Webster, Amy P; Maschke, Karen; Rothstein, Mark; Siebert, Reiner; Walter, Jörn; Beck, Stephan; Pastinen, Tomi; Joly, Yann.
Afiliación
  • Dyke SOM; Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G1, Canada. stephanie.dyke@mcgill.ca.
  • Saulnier KM; Montreal Neurological Institute, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada. stephanie.dyke@mcgill.ca.
  • Dupras C; Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G1, Canada.
  • Webster AP; Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G1, Canada.
  • Maschke K; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.
  • Rothstein M; The Hastings Center, Garrison, NY, 10524-4125, USA.
  • Siebert R; Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy and Law, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
  • Walter J; Institute of Human Genetics, Ulm University Medical Center, 89091, Ulm, Germany.
  • Beck S; Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
  • Pastinen T; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, UK.
  • Joly Y; Department of Human Genetics, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G1, Canada.
Genome Med ; 11(1): 31, 2019 05 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122281
ABSTRACT
As epigenetic studies become more common and lead to new insights into health and disease, the return of individual epigenetic results to research participants, in particular in large-scale epigenomic studies, will be of growing importance. Members of the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC) Bioethics Workgroup considered the potential ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) involved in returning epigenetic research results and incidental findings in order to produce a set of 'Points-to-consider' (P-t-C) for the epigenetics research community. These P-t-C draw on existing guidance on the return of genetic research results, while also integrating the IHEC Bioethics Workgroup's ELSI research on and discussion of the issues associated with epigenetic data as well as the experience of a return of results pilot study by the Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK). Major challenges include how to determine the clinical validity and actionability of epigenetic results, and considerations related to environmental exposures and epigenetic marks, including circumstances warranting the sharing of results with family members and third parties. Interdisciplinary collaboration and good public communication regarding epigenetic risk will be important to advance the return of results framework for epigenetic science.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Epigénesis Genética / Epigenómica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Genome Med Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Epigénesis Genética / Epigenómica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Genome Med Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá