Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the Implementation of American College of Surgeons Quality Indicators for Pancreatic Cancer Across an Integrated Health System.
Solomon, Daniel; DeNicola, Natasha; Feferman, Yael; Feingold, Daniela; Aycart, Samantha N; Magge, Deepa R; Golas, Benjamin J; Attiyeh, Fadi; Labow, Daniel M; Sarpel, Umut.
Afiliación
  • Solomon D; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • DeNicola N; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Feferman Y; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Feingold D; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Aycart SN; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Magge DR; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Golas BJ; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Attiyeh F; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Labow DM; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Sarpel U; 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
J Oncol Pract ; 15(8): e739-e745, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31260384
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recently published quality assurance (QA) indicators for pancreatic cancer care. Implementing quality indicators in a newly formed health system may lead to better patient selection and standardized cancer care.

METHODS:

Select ACS and internal quality indicators were implemented system wide in 2014. We compared compliance with these measures before and after their implementation at the main hospital and two new affiliate institutions.

RESULTS:

A total of 506 patients with pancreatic cancer were included. At the main hospital in the pre-QA period, 11 (12.6%) of 87 patients were discussed at our institutional multidisciplinary tumor board meeting; this number rose to 89 (49.7%) of 179 patients (P < .001) after the implementation. Clinical TNM stage was documented in the electronic medical record in 75 patients (86.2%) in the pre-QA group; this number rose to 170 (94.9%; P = .026) in the post-QA era. External imaging of patients undergoing resection was uploaded in 10 (66.7%) of 15 patient cases in the pre-QA period; this number rose to 33 (93.4%) of 35 (P = .020). Rates of time from diagnosis to treatment initiation shorter than 60 days were similar between eras (n = 26, 96.3% v n = 57, 95%). Implementation of QA measures at the affiliate institutions did not result in measurable differences. There were no differences in margin-negative resection rate, lymph node yield, or perioperative mortality after QA implementation at any site.

CONCLUSION:

The implementation of ACS quality indicators at our main hospital was feasible and effective for several measures, without delaying treatment. Instituting these indicators at lower-volume affiliates was more challenging.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Cirujanos Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Oncol Pract Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Cirujanos Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Oncol Pract Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article