Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computer-Assisted Design and Manufacturing Assists Less Experienced Surgeons in Achieving Equivalent Outcomes in Cranial Vault Reconstruction.
Cho, Regina S; Lopez, Joseph; Musavi, Leila; Kachniarz, Bartlomiej; Macmillan, Alexandra; Badiei, Beita; Bello, Ricardo; Dorafshar, Amir H.
Afiliación
  • Cho RS; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
  • Lopez J; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
  • Musavi L; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
  • Kachniarz B; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
  • Macmillan A; Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  • Badiei B; University of Maryland College Park, Clarksville, MD.
  • Bello R; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
  • Dorafshar AH; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(7): 2034-2038, 2019 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31306375
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to assess whether long-term outcomes were equivalent between computer-assisted design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) -assisted cranial vault reconstruction performed by an inexperienced surgeon, with fewer years of surgical experience, and traditional reconstruction performed by senior surgeons with many decades of experience.

METHODS:

An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective cohort study was performed for all patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis between the ages of 1 month to 18 years who received primary, open calvarial vault reconstruction at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1990 and 2017. The primary outcome variable was the Whitaker category (I-IV) for level of required revision at the 2-year follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, length of stay, operative time, and postoperative complications. CAD/CAM-assisted surgery was considered noninferior if the proportion of cases requiring any revision (Whitaker II, III, or IV) was no more than 10% greater than the proportion in the traditional surgery group with multivariate logistic regression analysis. t tests and fisher exact tests were used for secondary outcomes.

RESULTS:

A total of 335 patients were included, with 35 CAD/CAM-assisted reconstructions. CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction was noninferior to traditional after accounting for patient demographics, type of surgery, and experience level of the plastic surgeon. The traditional group required revision more frequently at 29.0% compared to CAD/CAM at 14.3%. Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups, but CAD/CAM had significantly longer average operative times (5.7 hours for CAD/CAM, 4.3 hours for traditional, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION:

CAD/CAM technology may lower the learning curve and assist less experienced plastic surgeons in achieving equivalent long-term outcomes in craniofacial reconstruction.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cráneo / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Moldova

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cráneo / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Moldova