Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Posterior Wall Isolation During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Thiyagarajah, Anand; Kadhim, Kadhim; Lau, Dennis H; Emami, Mehrdad; Linz, Dominik; Khokhar, Kashif; Munawar, Dian A; Mishima, Ricardo; Malik, Varun; O'Shea, Catherine; Mahajan, Rajiv; Sanders, Prashanthan.
Afiliación
  • Thiyagarajah A; Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., R.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Kadhim K; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Lau DH; Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., R.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Emami M; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Linz D; Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., R.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Khokhar K; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Munawar DA; Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., R.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Mishima R; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Malik V; Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., R.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • O'Shea C; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Mahajan R; Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., R.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
  • Sanders P; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia (A.T., K. Kadhim, D.H.L., M.E., D.L., K. Khokhar, D.A.M., V.M., C.O., R.M., P.S.).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 12(8): e007005, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31401853
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The posterior left atrium is an arrhythmogenic substrate that contributes to the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of posterior wall isolation (PWI) as an AF ablation strategy has not been widely reported.

METHODS:

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies performing PWI to assess (1) acute procedural success including the ability to achieve PWI and the number of procedure-related complications, (2) Long-term, clinical success including rates of arrhythmia recurrence and posterior wall reconnection, and (3) The efficacy of PWI compared with pulmonary vein isolation on preventing arrhythmia recurrence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched in May 2018 to retrieve relevant studies. Results were pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS:

Seventeen studies (13 box isolation, 3 single ring isolation, and 1 debulking ablation) comprising 1643 patients (31.3% paroxysmal AF, left atrial diameter 41±3.1 mm) were included in the final analysis. In studies focusing specifically on PWI, the acute procedural success rate for achieving PWI was 94.1% (95% CI, 87.2%-99.3%). Single-procedure 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 65.3% (95% CI, 57.7%-73.9%) overall and 61.9% (54.2%-70.8%) for persistent AF. Randomized control trials comparing PWI to pulmonary vein isolation (3 studies, 444 patients) yielded conflicting results and could not confirm an incremental benefit to PWI. Fifteen major complications (0.1%), including 2 atrio-esophageal fistulas, were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

PWI as an end point of AF ablation can be achieved in a large proportion of cases with good rates of 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia. Although the procedure-related complication rate is low, it did not eliminate the risk of atrio-esophageal fistula. Registration URL http//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018107212.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Ablación por Catéter / Atrios Cardíacos / Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Ablación por Catéter / Atrios Cardíacos / Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article