Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimized modification of the eighth edition of AJCC TNM staging system for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Pu, Ning; Yin, Lingdi; Habib, Joseph R; Gao, Shanshan; Hu, Haijie; Zhu, Yayun; Wu, Yong; Yu, Jun; Lou, Wenhui.
Afiliación
  • Pu N; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
  • Yin L; Department of Surgery & The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Habib JR; Department of Surgery & The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Gao S; Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, & Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China.
  • Hu H; Department of Surgery & The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Zhu Y; Department of Surgery & The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Wu Y; Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
  • Yu J; Department of Surgery & The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Lou W; Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan, PR China.
Future Oncol ; 15(30): 3457-3465, 2019 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31460788
ABSTRACT

Aim:

To reassess the prognostic performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and optimize the categorization of PDAC staging. Patients &

methods:

A total of 11,858 patients with resected PDAC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were retrospectively enrolled by sequential analyses.

Results:

There was no statistical significance between stage IIA and IIB tumors with hazard ratios of 2.065 and 2.184 (p = 0.620) for stages IIA and IIB, respectively. With the proposed modification, there was a significant difference between the hazard ratios of stages IIIA and IIIB which were 2.481 and 2.715, respectively (p = 0.009). The C-index of modified system was 0.609, slightly higher than AJCC 8th staging system 0.604.

Conclusion:

We proposed a modified eighth edition of the AJCC staging system by combining stage IIA with IIB and further subclassifying stage III patients in order to lead to better discriminative power.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Future Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Future Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article