Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis to Partition Body Mass Index Into Components of Body Composition: An Application to Head and Neck Cancer Survival.
Bradshaw, Patrick T; Zevallos, Jose P; Wisniewski, Kathy; Olshan, Andrew F.
Afiliación
  • Bradshaw PT; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
  • Zevallos JP; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Wisniewski K; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Olshan AF; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Am J Epidemiol ; 188(11): 2031-2039, 2019 11 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504108
Previous studies have suggested a "J-shaped" relationship between body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)2) and survival among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. However, BMI is a vague measure of body composition. To provide greater resolution, we used Bayesian sensitivity analysis, informed by external data, to model the relationship between predicted fat mass index (FMI, adipose tissue (kg)/height (m)2), lean mass index (LMI, lean tissue (kg)/height (m)2), and survival. We estimated posterior median hazard ratios and 95% credible intervals for the BMI-mortality relationship in a Bayesian framework using data from 1,180 adults in North Carolina with HNC diagnosed between 2002 and 2006. Risk factors were assessed by interview shortly after diagnosis and vital status through 2013 via the National Death Index. The relationship between BMI and all-cause mortality was convex, with a nadir at 28.6, with greater risk observed throughout the normal weight range. The sensitivity analysis indicated that this was consistent with opposing increases in risk with FMI (per unit increase, hazard ratio = 1.04 (1.00, 1.08)) and decreases with LMI (per unit increase, hazard ratio = 0.90 (0.85, 0.95)). Patterns were similar for HNC-specific mortality but associations were stronger. Measures of body composition, rather than BMI, should be considered in relation to mortality risk.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Composición Corporal / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Índice de Masa Corporal / Teorema de Bayes / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Epidemiol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Composición Corporal / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Índice de Masa Corporal / Teorema de Bayes / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Epidemiol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article