Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of the low FODMAP diet in functional gastrointestinal symptoms: A real-world experience.
Tuck, Caroline J; Reed, David E; Muir, Jane G; Vanner, Stephen J.
Afiliación
  • Tuck CJ; Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Reed DE; Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Muir JG; Department of Gastroenterology, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Vanner SJ; Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 32(1): e13730, 2020 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31571351
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The low FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet reduces functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGID) when implemented by dietitian-delivered education in clinical trials, but it is unknown how well the diet is followed in routine clinical care and if differences exist when implemented by physician or dietitian. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world experience of patients recommended the diet.

METHODS:

This case-series interviewed FGID patients attending a gastroenterology clinic with previous recommendation to trial the low FODMAP diet, examining who recommended the diet and what their percentage improvement was. To evaluate implementation of the diet's 3 phases, questions were constructed based on current literature and clinical guidelines regarding length of initial restriction and food knowledge (Phase-1), number of foods re-challenged (Phase-2) and food re-introduction as tolerated (Phase-3). The comprehensive nutrition assessment questionnaire provided daily FODMAP intake. Data were analyzed using chi-squared tests. KEY

RESULTS:

In 80 patients (21 male), the diet was recommended by the gastroenterologist in 53%, general practitioner 22%, dietitian 9% and other 15%. 30% saw a dietitian for guidance. 55% reported a ≥50% symptom improvement. The diet was followed appropriately during Phase-1 by 78% (with vs without a dietitian, 96% vs 71%; P = .02), Phase-2 by 48% (70% vs 39%; P = .02) and Phase-3 by 40% (65% vs 29%; P < .01). A FODMAP intake of <12 g/d (considered therapeutic) was achieved by 44% (72% vs 31%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Symptom improvement was reported in half of patients, but many did not reach the therapeutic FODMAP intake target, especially without dietitian education. Compliance was poor in Phase-2 and Phase-3 but improved with dietitian guidance.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dieta Baja en Carbohidratos / Enfermedades Gastrointestinales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neurogastroenterol Motil Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dieta Baja en Carbohidratos / Enfermedades Gastrointestinales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neurogastroenterol Motil Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá