Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to investing in cycling: Stakeholder views from England.
Aldred, Rachel; Watson, Tom; Lovelace, Robin; Woodcock, James.
Afiliación
  • Aldred R; Department of Planning and Transport, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Westminster University, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5LS, United Kingdom.
  • Watson T; Policy Studies Institute, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Westminster University, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5LS, United Kingdom.
  • Lovelace R; Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, 34-40 University Road, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
  • Woodcock J; UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract ; 128: 149-159, 2019 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31582879
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Planners and politicians in many countries seek to increase the proportion of trips made by cycling. However, this is often challenging. In England, a national target to double cycling by 2025 is likely to be missed between 2001 and 2011 the proportion of commutes made by cycling barely grew. One important contributory factor is continued low investment in cycling infrastructure, by comparison to European leaders.

METHODS:

This paper examines barriers to cycling investment, considering that these need to be better understood to understand failures to increase cycling level. It is based on qualitative data from an online survey of over 400 stakeholders, alongside seven in-depth interviews.

RESULTS:

Many respondents reported that change continues to be blocked by chronic barriers including a lack of funding and leadership. Participants provided insights into how challenges develop along the life of a scheme. In authorities with little consideration given to cycling provision, media and public opposition were not reported as a major issue. However, where planning and implementation have begun, this can change quickly; although examples were given of schemes successfully proceeding, despite this. The research points to a growing gap between authorities that have overcome key challenges, and those that have not.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Transp Res Part A Policy Pract Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Transp Res Part A Policy Pract Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido