Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic impact of a large mesenteric mass >2 cm in ileal neuroendocrine tumors.
Kasai, Yosuke; Mahuron, Kelly; Hirose, Kenzo; Corvera, Carlos U; Kim, Grace E; Hope, Thomas A; Shih, Brandon E; Warren, Robert S; Bergsland, Emily K; Nakakura, Eric K.
Afiliación
  • Kasai Y; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Mahuron K; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Hirose K; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Corvera CU; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Kim GE; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Hope TA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Shih BE; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Warren RS; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Bergsland EK; Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Nakakura EK; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
J Surg Oncol ; 120(8): 1311-1317, 2019 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613999
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Ileal neuroendocrine tumors (i-NETs) frequently metastasize to mesenteric lymph nodes and the liver. Regional lymphadenopathy is associated with desmoplasia of the mesentery forming a large mesenteric mass (LMM). Although the latest American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging (8th edition) defined LMM >2 cm as N2, the prognostic impact of LMM is ill-defined. We evaluated whether LMM is prognostic for patients with i-NETs.

METHODS:

This single-institution, retrospective cohort study included 106 patients who underwent resection of i-NETs between 2007 and 2018. Overall survival (OS) and liver progression-free survival (LPFS) were compared between patients with and without LMM.

RESULTS:

LMM was present in 66 patients (62%) and was not associated with the presence or absence of liver metastasis (P = .969) or the extent of liver involvement (P = .938). OS and LPFS differed significantly between patients with and without LMM (5-year OS rates of 64.8% and 92.9%, respectively, P = .011; 3-year LPFS rates of 45.3% and 67.5%, respectively, P = .025). In multivariate analysis, LMM was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (hazard ratio 4.69, 95% confidence interval 1.63-17.6) and LPFS (1.99, 1.08-3.88).

CONCLUSION:

LMM >2 cm is prognostic for OS and LPFS and represents aggressive tumor biology.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tumores Neuroendocrinos / Neoplasias del Íleon / Ganglios Linfáticos / Mesenterio Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tumores Neuroendocrinos / Neoplasias del Íleon / Ganglios Linfáticos / Mesenterio Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article