Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of Personal Protective Equipment on Firefighter Occupational Performance.
Lesniak, Ashley Y; Bergstrom, Haley C; Clasey, Jody L; Stromberg, Arnold J; Abel, Mark G.
Afiliación
  • Lesniak AY; Department of Health Science, Lock Haven University, Lock Haven, Pennsylvania; and.
  • Bergstrom HC; Departments of Kinesiology and Health Promotion; and.
  • Clasey JL; Departments of Kinesiology and Health Promotion; and.
  • Stromberg AJ; Departments of Kinesiology and Health Promotion; and.
  • Abel MG; Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
J Strength Cond Res ; 34(8): 2165-2172, 2020 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31714455
Lesniak, AY, Bergstrom, HC, Clasey, JL, Stromberg, AJ, and Abel, MG. The effect of personal protective equipment on firefighter occupational performance. J Strength Cond Res 34(8): 2165-2172, 2020-The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of load carriage (LC) and LC plus respirator use (LC + self-contained breathing apparatus [SCBA]) on firefighters' work capacity to enhance our understanding of occupational demands. Twenty-one male structural firefighter recruits (age: 28.6 ± 4.3 years; height: 178.6 ± 7.2 cm; body mass: 94.1 ± 15.4 kg; body fat: 22.9 ± 6.1%) participated. Occupational performance was assessed by time to complete a simulated fire ground test (SFGT). After 2 familiarization trials, recruits performed the following SFGT conditions in a randomized order: PT (physical training clothes), LC only, and LC + SCBA. To describe within-group differences between SFGT conditions, relative difference scores were calculated as follows: % difference = ([experimental trial outcome - PT trial outcome]/PT trial outcome) × 100. Statistical differences between conditions were assessed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. The level of significance was set p < 0.01. Time to complete the LC + SCBA trial (345.9 ± 43.7 seconds; p < 0.001) and LC-only trial (331.2 ± 39.3 seconds; p < 0.001) were significantly greater than the PT trial (241.0 ± 33.3 seconds). Post-SFGT rating of perceived exertion was higher in the LC + SCBA trial (6.7 ± 1.7) and LC trial (6.4 ± 1.5) compared with the PT trial (4.7 ± 1.8; p < 0.001). Heart rate and lactate measures were similar across conditions (p = 0.488; p = 0.287). Personal protective equipment (PPE) significantly decreases the work capacity and increases the perceived effort of occupational tasks. Thus, these findings describe the additional physical demands produced by PPE and indicate that performance of firefighting tasks in an unloaded condition does not reflect work capacity in a bona fide condition.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria / Salud Laboral / Soporte de Peso / Bomberos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Strength Cond Res Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria / Salud Laboral / Soporte de Peso / Bomberos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Strength Cond Res Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article