Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Involving More than 8,000 Patients.
Miller, Larry E; Bhattacharyya, Samir; Parrish, William R; Fredericson, Michael; Bisson, Brad; Altman, Roy D.
Afiliación
  • Miller LE; Miller Scientific Consulting, Inc., Asheville, NC, USA.
  • Bhattacharyya S; DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA.
  • Parrish WR; DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA.
  • Fredericson M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Bisson B; DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA.
  • Altman RD; Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cartilage ; 13(1_suppl): 351S-363S, 2021 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31735075
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report the safety of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS:

We identified randomized controlled trials reporting the safety of IAHA versus IA saline in adults with symptomatic knee OA. Main safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs), local AEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), study withdrawals, and AE-related study withdrawals.

RESULTS:

A total of 35 randomized controlled trials with 38 group comparisons comprising 8,078 unique patients (IAHA 4,295, IA saline 3,783) were included in the meta-analysis. Comparing IAHA with IA saline over a median of 6 months follow-up, there were no differences in the risk of AEs (42.4% vs. 39.7%, risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.96-1.07, P = 0.61), SAEs (1.8% vs. 1.2%, RR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.91-2.26, P=0.12), study withdrawals (12.3% vs. 12.7%, RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.87-1.12, P = 0.83), or AE-related study withdrawals (2.7% vs. 2.1%, RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.97-1.93, P = 0.08). Local AEs, all of which were nonserious, were more common with IAHA vs. IA saline (14.5% vs. 11.7%, RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.07-1.36, P = 0.003) and typically resolved within days.

CONCLUSION:

IAHA was shown to be safe for use in patients with symptomatic knee OA. Compared with IA saline, IAHA is associated with an increased risk of nonserious, transient local reactions. There was no evidence to suggest any additional safety risks of IAHA.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoartritis de la Rodilla / Ácido Hialurónico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cartilage Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoartritis de la Rodilla / Ácido Hialurónico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cartilage Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos