Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glass-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures for replacing a single premolar tooth: A prospective investigation with a 4-year follow-up.
Zhang, Xinyan; Li, Tong; Wang, Xiaoxi; Yang, Lili; Wu, Junling.
Afiliación
  • Zhang X; Graduate student, Graduate Prosthodontics, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan, PR China.
  • Li T; Associate Professor, Department of Endodontics, Jinan Stomatological Hospital, Jinan, PR China.
  • Wang X; Graduate student, Graduate Prosthodontics, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan, PR China.
  • Yang L; Graduate student, Graduate Prosthodontics, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan, PR China.
  • Wu J; Associate Professor, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan, PR China. Electronic address: doctorwujunling@163.com.
J Prosthet Dent ; 124(1): 53-59, 2020 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31735350
ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF

PROBLEM:

Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) are a reliable treatment option for the replacement of a single missing tooth. Glass-ceramic may be a promising material for the fabrication of RBFPDs, but clinical verification has been lacking.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the outcomes of glass-ceramic RBFPDs on participants with a single missing premolar. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Twenty participants (6 men, 14 women; age range 20 to 54 years) were treated with 2-retainer RBFPDs. These RBFPDs were made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press; Ivoclar Vivadent AG) and designed with improved C-shaped retention. These prostheses were evaluated at 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter and were classified as survival or failure. Analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier analysis (95% confidence interval). Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to rate the clinical performance. Parameters assessed were fracture, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, color of restoration, secondary caries, and abutment mobility.

RESULTS:

Twenty RBFPDs were provided, 9 in the maxilla and 11 in the mandible. The mean observation time was 49.2 months (minimum 9 months, maximum 53 months). Nineteen RBFPDs were evaluated as having survived during the observation period with some acceptable marginal discoloration, 1 RBFPD had to be replaced because of fracture and secondary caries and was evaluated as a failure. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a survival rate of 95% after a 4-year observation.

CONCLUSIONS:

The glass-ceramic RBFPDs in this study displayed a good survival rate and clinical performance, indicating that glass-ceramic RBFPDs might be a promising approach for the short-term replacement of a single premolar. However, further investigations are needed to determine the long-term outcome.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dentadura Parcial Fija con Resina Consolidada Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dentadura Parcial Fija con Resina Consolidada Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article