Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stillbirth and subsequent pregnancy outcome - a cohort from a large tertiary referral hospital.
Pekkola, Maria; Tikkanen, Minna; Gissler, Mika; Paavonen, Jorma; Stefanovic, Vedran.
Afiliación
  • Pekkola M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Tikkanen M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Gissler M; THL, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Information Services Department, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Paavonen J; Karolinska Institute, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Stefanovic V; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
J Perinat Med ; 48(8): 765-770, 2020 Oct 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31926100
ABSTRACT
Objectives This study aimed to assess pregnancy and delivery outcomes in women with a history of stillbirth in a large tertiary referral hospital. Methods This was a retrospective study from Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. The cohort comprised 214 antepartum singleton stillbirths in the period 2003-2015 (case group). Of these, 154 delivered by the end of 2017. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared to those in singleton pregnancies of parous women in Finland from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (reference group). Results The rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher among case women for preeclampsia (3.3 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.002), preterm birth (8.5 vs. 3.9%, P = 0.004), small-for-gestational-age (SGA) children (7.8 vs. 2.2%, P < 0.001) and stillbirth (2.7 vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001). There were four preterm recurrent stillbirths. Induction of labor was more common among case women than parous women in the reference group (49.4 vs. 18.3%, P < 0.001). Duration of pregnancy was shorter among case women (38.29 ± 3.20 vs. 39.27 ± 2.52, P < 0.001), and mean birth weight was lower among newborns of the case women (3274 ± 770 vs. 3491 ± 674 g, P < 0.001). Conclusion Although the rates for adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher compared to the parous background population, the overall probability of a favorable outcome was high. The risk of recurrent premature stillbirth in our cohort was higher than that for parous women in general during the study period. No recurrent term stillbirths occurred, however.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional / Nacimiento Prematuro / Mortinato / Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Perinat Med Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional / Nacimiento Prematuro / Mortinato / Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Perinat Med Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia