Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors and outcomes associated with anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kamarajah, Sivesh K; Lin, Aaron; Tharmaraja, Thahesh; Bharwada, Yashvi; Bundred, James R; Nepogodiev, Dmitri; Evans, Richard P T; Singh, Pritam; Griffiths, Ewen A.
Afiliación
  • Kamarajah SK; Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University NHS Foundation Trust Hospitals, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Lin A; Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Tharmaraja T; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Bharwada Y; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Bundred JR; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Nepogodiev D; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Evans RPT; Department of Academic Surgery and College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Singh P; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Griffiths EA; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Dis Esophagus ; 33(3)2020 Mar 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31957798
Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major complication after esophagectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine identify risks factors for AL (preoperative, intra-operative, and post-operative factors) and assess the consequences to outcome on patients who developed an AL. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 31 December 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modeling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration CRD42018130732). This review identified 174 studies reporting outcomes of 74,226 patients undergoing esophagectomy. The overall pooled AL rates were 11%, ranging from 0 to 49% in individual studies. Majority of studies were from Asia (n = 79). In pooled analyses, 23 factors were associated with AL (17 preoperative and six intraoperative). AL were associated with adverse outcomes including pulmonary (OR: 4.54, CI95%: 2.99-6.89, P < 0.001) and cardiac complications (OR: 2.44, CI95%: 1.77-3.37, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (mean difference: 15 days, CI95%: 10-21 days, P < 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (OR: 5.91, CI95%: 1.41-24.79, P = 0.015). AL are a major complication following esophagectomy accounting for major morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis identified modifiable risk factors for AL, which can be a target for interventions to reduce AL rates. Furthermore, identification of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors will facilitate risk stratification and prediction of AL enabling better perioperative planning, patient counseling, and informed consent.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Ajuste de Riesgo / Fuga Anastomótica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dis Esophagus Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Ajuste de Riesgo / Fuga Anastomótica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dis Esophagus Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article