Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electrophysiological characteristics and clinical values of left bundle branch current of injury in left bundle branch pacing.
Su, Lan; Xu, Tiancheng; Cai, Mengxing; Xu, Lei; Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi; Sharma, Parikshit S; Chen, Xiao; Zheng, Rujie; Wu, Shengjie; Huang, Weijian.
Afiliación
  • Su L; Department of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Xu T; The Key Lab of Cardiovascular Disease of Wenzhou, Wenzhou, China.
  • Cai M; Department of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Xu L; The Key Lab of Cardiovascular Disease of Wenzhou, Wenzhou, China.
  • Vijayaraman P; Department of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Sharma PS; The Key Lab of Cardiovascular Disease of Wenzhou, Wenzhou, China.
  • Chen X; Department of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Zheng R; The Key Lab of Cardiovascular Disease of Wenzhou, Wenzhou, China.
  • Wu S; Geisinger Heart Institute, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
  • Huang W; Section of Cardiology, Rush Heart Center for Women, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 31(4): 834-842, 2020 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32009260
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is emerging as a novel option for physiological ventricular pacing. The impact of current of injury (COI) at left bundle branch (LBB) has not been previously evaluated.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients with QRS duration less than 120 milliseconds referred for LBBP in whom LBB potentials were recorded were included from August 2018 to March 2019. We recorded LBB COI during LBBP and assessed its impact on the pacing parameters and complications during implantation and at short term follow-up.

RESULTS:

A total of 115 patients with an identifiable LBB potential at implant were included. LBB COI was confirmed in 77 (67.0%) of these patients. Three types of LBB COI were observed. LBB was captured in all patients at a pacing threshold less than 1.5 V/0.5 ms in COI(+) patients, while present in only 29 patients without an LBB COI(-) (100% vs 76.3%; P < .001). There was no significant difference between COI(+) and COI(-) patients in LBB bundle capture threshold (0.64 ± 0.24 vs 0.74 ± 0.26 V/0.5 ms). Selective LBBP was more common in COI(+) group than COI(-) group (54.5% vs 0%; P < .001). Pacing parameters were stable and no lead perforation or dislodgements were observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS:

LBB COI is commonly observed during LBBP in cases with an identifiable LBB potential and can be associated with a low LBB capture threshold and demonstrable selective capture of the LBB acutely and during follow-up. A COI does not preclude safe and stable LBBP pacing.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arritmias Cardíacas / Fascículo Atrioventricular / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Insuficiencia Cardíaca / Lesiones Cardíacas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arritmias Cardíacas / Fascículo Atrioventricular / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Insuficiencia Cardíaca / Lesiones Cardíacas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China