Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of complications related to laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted procedures in dogs.
Maurin, Marie-Pauline; Mullins, Ronan A; Singh, Ameet; Mayhew, Philipp D.
Afiliación
  • Maurin MP; School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Mullins RA; School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Singh A; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mayhew PD; Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Vet Surg ; 49 Suppl 1: O5-O14, 2020 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32333685
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate and report the quality of the scientific literature reporting complications associated with laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted procedures in client-owned or healthy research dogs and to report and illustrate laparoscopic complications related to individual organ systems. STUDY

DESIGN:

Systematic review. ANIMALS Client-owned or healthy research dogs.

METHODS:

A literature review was performed by using PubMed and CAB abstracts for English-language studies providing descriptions of complications related to laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted procedures in dogs. Study selection used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Quality assessment was performed by using a MINORS (Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies) scoring system and a grading scale of level of evidence. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS:

In total, 741 manuscripts were identified, with 64 manuscripts eligible for data extraction and quality assessment. The most represented organ system was the female genital tract, represented by 22 (34.4%) studies. The most commonly reported intraoperative and postoperative complications were related to abdominal entry and portal incisions, respectively. In 53 of 54 non-randomized studies, high risk of bias was found. Forty-eight (75%) studies provided level III or IV evidence.

CONCLUSION:

This report provides an updated review of complications related to laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted procedures in dogs, classified by organ system. The overall quality of evidence was low, limiting direct comparison of complication rates between studies. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

There is a need for implementation of standardized criteria for defining complications, study time frames and greater numbers of high quality prospective randomized trials in veterinary laparoscopy to permit comparison of complication and conversion rates between published studies and across organ systems.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Laparoscopía / Enfermedades de los Perros / Perros Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Surg Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Laparoscopía / Enfermedades de los Perros / Perros Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Surg Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda