Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Proficiency Testing Schemes for Food Nutrition Analysis in Japan (2017-2018)].
Takebayashi, Jun; Takasaka, Noriko; Suzuki, Ippei; Nakasaka, Toshiaki; Hirabayashi, Naoyuki; Ishimi, Yoshiko; Umegaki, Keizo; Chiba, Tsuyoshi; Watanabe, Takaho.
Afiliación
  • Takebayashi J; National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition.
  • Takasaka N; Hatano Research Institute, Food and Drug Safety Center.
  • Suzuki I; National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition.
  • Nakasaka T; Hatano Research Institute, Food and Drug Safety Center.
  • Hirabayashi N; Hatano Research Institute, Food and Drug Safety Center.
  • Ishimi Y; National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition.
  • Umegaki K; NODAI Research Institute, Tokyo University of Agriculture.
  • Chiba T; National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition.
  • Watanabe T; Department of Food Safety and Management, Showa Women's University.
Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi ; 61(2): 63-71, 2020.
Article en Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32336711
This paper deals with proficiency testing schemes for food nutrition analysis in Japan. In schemes in 2017 and 2018, 65 and 73 organizations participated, respectively, and more than 70% of the participants were public organizations responsible for a nutrition-labeling compliance test. The food matrices were pork and chicken sausages, and analytes were protein, fat, ash, moisture, carbohydrate, energy, sodium, salt equivalent, calcium (2018 only), and iron (2018 only). The organizations reporting inadequate laboratory values in one or more nutrients for mandatory declaration (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, or salt equivalent) were 11 and 15% of all organizations and 9 and 13% of public organizations in the 2017 and 2018 schemes, respectively. The approximate relative standard deviations for proficiency assessment (RSDr) were as follows: protein, 2%; fat, 3%; ash, 2%; moisture, 0.5%; carbohydrate, 9%; energy, 1%; sodium (salt equivalent), 4%; calcium, 7%; and iron, 7%. Notably, the large RSDr value for carbohydrate may cause inconsistency among laboratories in compliance tests for foods containing several grams or less of carbohydrate per 100 grams.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayos de Aptitud de Laboratorios / Análisis de los Alimentos / Etiquetado de Alimentos País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: Ja Revista: Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayos de Aptitud de Laboratorios / Análisis de los Alimentos / Etiquetado de Alimentos País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: Ja Revista: Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article