Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between minimal fluoroscopy and conventional approaches for visually guided laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation ablation.
Huang, Henry D; Rodriguez, Jason M; Serafini, Nicholas J; Macias, Carlos; Winterfield, Jeffrey; Sharma, Parikshit S; Larsen, Timothy; Krishnan, Kousik; Trohman, Richard G.
Afiliación
  • Huang HD; Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Rodriguez JM; Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Serafini NJ; Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Macias C; Division of Cardiology, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • Winterfield J; Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Sharma PS; Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Larsen T; Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Krishnan K; Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Trohman RG; Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 31(7): 1608-1615, 2020 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32406100
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Although balloon-based techniques, such as the laser balloon (LB) ablation have simplified pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), procedural fluoroscopy usage remains higher in comparison to radiofrequency PVI approaches due to limited 3-dimensional mapping system integration.

METHODS:

In this prospective study, 50 consecutive patients were randomly assigned in alternating fashion to a low fluoroscopy group (LFG; n = 25) or conventional fluoroscopy group (CFG; n = 25) and underwent de novo PVI procedures using visually guided LB technique.

RESULTS:

There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics or cross-overs between treatment groups. Acute PVI was accomplished in all patients. Mean follow up was 318 ± 69 days. Clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after PVI was similar between groups (CFG 19% vs LFG 15%; P = .72). Total fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in the LFG than the CFG (1.7 ± 1.4  vs 16.9 ± 5.9 minutes; P < .001) despite similar total procedure duration (143 ± 22 vs 148 ± 22 minutes; P = .42) and mean LA dwell time (63 ± 15 vs 59 ± 10 minutes; P = .28). Mean dose area product was significantly lower in the LFG (181 ± 125 vs 1980 ± 750 µGym2 ; P < .001). Fluoroscopy usage after transseptal access was substantially lower in the LFG (0.63 ± 0.43 vs 11.70 ± 4.32 minutes; P < .001). Complications rates were similar between both groups (4% vs 2%; P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates that LB PVI can be safely achieved using a novel low fluoroscopy protocol while also substantially reducing fluoroscopy usage and radiation exposure in comparison to conventional approaches for LB ablation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Venas Pulmonares / Fibrilación Atrial / Ablación por Catéter Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Venas Pulmonares / Fibrilación Atrial / Ablación por Catéter Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article