Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Telehealth Uptake into Prenatal Care and Provider Attitudes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis.
Madden, Nigel; Emeruwa, Ukachi N; Friedman, Alexander M; Aubey, Janice J; Aziz, Aleha; Baptiste, Caitlin D; Coletta, Jaclyn M; D'Alton, Mary E; Fuchs, Karin M; Goffman, Dena; Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia; Kondragunta, Sneha; Krenitsky, Nicole; Miller, Russell S; Nhan-Chang, Chia-Ling; Saint Jean, Ashanda M; Shukla, Hemangi P; Simpson, Lynn L; Spiegel, Erica S; Yates, Hope S; Zork, Noelia; Ona, Samsiya.
Afiliación
  • Madden N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Emeruwa UN; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Friedman AM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Aubey JJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Aziz A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Baptiste CD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Coletta JM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • D'Alton ME; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Fuchs KM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Goffman D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Kondragunta S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Krenitsky N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Miller RS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Nhan-Chang CL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Saint Jean AM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Shukla HP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Simpson LL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Spiegel ES; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Yates HS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Zork N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Ona S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Am J Perinatol ; 37(10): 1005-1014, 2020 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32516816
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) determine to what degree prenatal care was able to be transitioned to telehealth at prenatal practices associated with two affiliated hospitals in New York City during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and (2) describe providers' experience with this transition. STUDY DESIGN: Trends in whether prenatal care visits were conducted in-person or via telehealth were analyzed by week for a 5-week period from March 9 to April 12 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC)-affiliated prenatal practices in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic. Visits were analyzed for maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) and general obstetrical faculty practices, as well as a clinic system serving patients with public insurance. The proportion of visits that were telehealth was analyzed by visit type by week. A survey and semistructured interviews of providers were conducted evaluating resources and obstacles in the uptake of telehealth. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 4,248 visits, of which approximately one-third were performed by telehealth (n = 1,352, 31.8%). By the fifth week, 56.1% of generalist visits, 61.5% of MFM visits, and 41.5% of clinic visits were performed via telehealth. A total of 36 providers completed the survey and 11 were interviewed. Accessing technology and performing visits, documentation, and follow-up using the telehealth electronic medical record were all viewed favorably by providers. In transitioning to telehealth, operational challenges were more significant for health clinics than for MFM and generalist faculty practices with patients receiving public insurance experiencing greater difficulties and barriers to care. Additional resources on the patient and operational level were required to optimize attendance at in-person and video visits for clinic patients. CONCLUSION: Telehealth was rapidly implemented in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic and was viewed favorably by providers. Limited barriers to care were observed for practices serving patients with commercial insurance. However, to optimize access for patients with Medicaid, additional patient-level and operational supports were required. KEY POINTS: · Telehealth uptake differed based on insurance.. · Medicaid patients may require increased assistance for telehealth.. · Quick adoption of telehealth is feasible..
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonía Viral / Atención Prenatal / Personal de Salud / Telemedicina / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Pandemias / Seguridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Perinatol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonía Viral / Atención Prenatal / Personal de Salud / Telemedicina / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Pandemias / Seguridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Perinatol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article