Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Wang, Yu-Mei; Sun, Xiu-Mei; Zhou, Yi-Min; Chen, Jing-Ran; Cheng, Kun-Ming; Li, Hong-Liang; Yang, Yan-Lin; Zhou, Jian-Xin.
Afiliación
  • Wang YM; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Sun XM; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Zhou YM; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Chen JR; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Cheng KM; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Li HL; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Yang YL; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Zhou JX; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Int Med Res ; 48(6): 300060520920426, 2020 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32529868
OBJECTIVE: Measurement of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced recruitment lung volume using passive spirometry is based on the assumption that the functional residual capacity (FRC) is not modified by the PEEP changes. We aimed to investigate the influence of PEEP on FRC in different models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: A randomized crossover study was performed in 12 pigs. Pulmonary (n = 6) and extra-pulmonary (n = 6) ARDS models were established using an alveolar instillation of hydrochloric acid and a right atrium injection of oleic acid, respectively. Low (5 cmH2O) and high (15 cmH2O) PEEP were randomly applied in each animal. FRC and recruitment volume were determined using the nitrogen wash-in/wash-out technique and release maneuver. RESULTS: FRC was not significantly different between the two PEEP levels in either pulmonary ARDS (299 ± 92 mL and 309 ± 130 mL at 5 and 15 cmH2O, respectively) or extra-pulmonary ARDS (305 ± 143 mL and 328 ± 197 mL at 5 and 15 cmH2O, respectively). The recruitment volume was not significantly different between the two models (pulmonary, 341 ± 100 mL; extra-pulmonary, 351 ± 170 mL). CONCLUSIONS: PEEP did not influence FRC in either the pulmonary or extra-pulmonary ARDS pig model.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / Espirometría / Respiración con Presión Positiva Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Int Med Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / Espirometría / Respiración con Presión Positiva Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Int Med Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China