Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intrathecal hydrophilic opioids for abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trial sequential analysis.
Koning, Mark V; Klimek, Markus; Rijs, Koen; Stolker, Robert J; Heesen, Michael A.
Afiliación
  • Koning MV; Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Markkoning66@hotmail.com.
  • Klimek M; Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Rijs K; Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Stolker RJ; Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Heesen MA; Department of Anaesthesiology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Br J Anaesth ; 125(3): 358-372, 2020 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32660719
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intrathecal hydrophilic opioids decrease systemic opioid consumption after abdominal surgery and potentially facilitate enhanced recovery. A meta-analysis is needed to quantify associated risks and benefits.

METHODS:

A systematic search was performed to find RCTs investigating intrathecal hydrophilic opioids in abdominal surgery. Caesarean section and continuous regional or neuraxial techniques were excluded. Several subgroup analyses were prespecified. A conventional meta-analysis, meta-regression, trial sequential analysis, and provision of GRADE scores were planned.

RESULTS:

The search yielded 40 trials consisting of 2500 patients. A difference was detected in 'i.v. morphine consumption' at Day 1 {mean difference [MD] -18.4 mg, (95% confidence interval [CI] -22.3 to -14.4)} and Day 2 (MD -25.5 mg [95% CI -30.2 to -20.8]), pain scores at Day 1 in rest (MD -0.9 [95% CI -1.1 to -0.7]) and during movement (MD -1.2 [95% CI -1.6 to -0.8]), length of stay (MD -0.2 days [95% CI -0.4 to -0.1]) and pruritus (relative risk 4.3 [95% CI 2.5-7.5]) but not in nausea or sedation. A difference was detected for respiratory depression (odds ratio 5.5 [95% CI 2.1-14.2]) but not when two small outlying studies were excluded (odds ratio 1.4 [95% CI 0.4-5.2]). The level of evidence was graded as high for morphine consumption, in part because the required information size was reached.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study showed important opioid-sparing effects of intrathecal hydrophilic opioids. Our data suggest a dose-dependent relationship between the risk of respiratory depression and the dose of intrathecal opioids. Excluding two high-dose studies, intrathecal opioids have a comparable incidence of respiratory depression as the control group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO-registry CRD42018090682.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Analgesia Epidural / Abdomen / Analgésicos Opioides Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Analgesia Epidural / Abdomen / Analgésicos Opioides Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article