Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Child development assessment: Practitioner input in the revision for Griffiths III.
Green, Elizabeth M; Stroud, Louise; Marx, Candice; Cronje, Johan.
Afiliación
  • Green EM; Association for Research in Infant and Child Development, Birmingham, UK.
  • Stroud L; Department of Psychology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
  • Marx C; Association for Research in Infant and Child Development, Birmingham, UK.
  • Cronje J; Department of Psychology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Child Care Health Dev ; 46(6): 682-691, 2020 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32681520
INTRODUCTION: The input from practitioners in developmental assessment test revision is a crucial and leading component of the project. This paper highlights six key phases of the Griffiths III revision process and the value of having a guiding plan that includes test practitioner input. METHODS: The revision of the Griffiths III consisted of six separate phases that were supported by practitioner and user input and feedback. These six phases and practitioner views ensured that the necessary core constructs and new areas for item development were included in the revised version. These processes also underscored the construct development and task review, item design, piloting and standardization of the revised version, as well as its production, release and subsequent training methods. RESULTS: The six guiding phases provided a methodologically robust frame to the revision process. Practitioners valued an overall developmental measure with discrete data about and within the 'avenues of learning' allowing them to analyse a child's strengths and weaknesses. Communication with practitioners across the world demonstrated the wide disparity of culture and environments that the Griffiths Scales are deployed in. It is not possible to design a revised scale that is appropriate for all areas of use, so in this revision process, it was decided to design the scales as culturally fair as possible and support practitioners in other countries to translate and validate the scales for use. CONCLUSIONS: The revision of the Griffiths III found test users to be valuable sources of information on the basis of their experiences with the test and professional knowledge. Creating a continuous feedback mechanism within a phased process provided opportunities for the revision team to engage meaningfully with the data being obtained as well as test users to advance the scope and quality of the test. Revision teams are encouraged to consider the process and engagement methods explored in this study during their projects.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas Psicológicas / Desarrollo Infantil / Discapacidades del Desarrollo Límite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Child Care Health Dev Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas Psicológicas / Desarrollo Infantil / Discapacidades del Desarrollo Límite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Child Care Health Dev Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article