Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantifying the Public Health Benefits of Reducing Air Pollution: Critically Assessing the Features and Capabilities of WHO's AirQ+ and U.S. EPA's Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program - Community Edition (BenMAP - CE).
Sacks, Jason D; Fann, Neal; Gumy, Sophie; Kim, Ingu; Ruggeri, Giulia; Mudu, Pierpaolo.
Afiliación
  • Sacks JD; Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
  • Fann N; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
  • Gumy S; Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Kim I; European Centre for Environment and Health, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Bonn, Germany.
  • Ruggeri G; Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Mudu P; European Centre for Environment and Health, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Bonn, Germany.
Atmosphere (Basel) ; 11(5): 1-15, 2020 May 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32802480
ABSTRACT
Scientific evidence spanning experimental and epidemiologic studies has shown that air pollution exposures can lead to a range of health effects. Quantitative approaches that allow for the estimation of the adverse health impacts attributed to air pollution enable researchers and policy analysts to convey the public health impact of poor air quality. Multiple tools are currently available to conduct such analyses, which includes software packages designed by the World Health Organization (WHO) AirQ+, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program - Community Edition (BenMAP - CE), to quantify the number and economic value of air pollution-attributable premature deaths and illnesses. WHO's AirQ+ and U.S. EPA's BenMAP - CE are among the most popular tools to quantify these effects as reflected by the hundreds of peer-reviewed publications and technical reports over the past two decades that have employed these tools spanning many countries and multiple continents. Within this paper we conduct an analysis using common input parameters to compare AirQ+ and BenMAP - CE and show that the two software packages well align in the calculation of health impacts. Additionally, we detail the research questions best addressed by each tool.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Atmosphere (Basel) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Atmosphere (Basel) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article