Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients.
Lo, Clement; Toyama, Tadashi; Oshima, Megumi; Jun, Min; Chin, Ken L; Hawley, Carmel M; Zoungas, Sophia.
Afiliación
  • Lo C; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Toyama T; Diabetes and Vascular Medicine Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.
  • Oshima M; The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
  • Jun M; Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Chin KL; Innovative Clinical Research Center (iCREK), Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Hawley CM; The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
  • Zoungas S; Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 8: CD009966, 2020 07 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32803882
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Kidney transplantation is the preferred management for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, it is often complicated by worsening or new-onset diabetes. The safety and efficacy of glucose-lowering agents after kidney transplantation is largely unknown. This is an update of a review first published in 2017.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new onset diabetes in people who have undergone kidney transplantation. SEARCH

METHODS:

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 16 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cross-over studies examining head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in patients who have received a kidney transplant and have diabetes were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND

ANALYSIS:

Four authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN

RESULTS:

Ten studies (21 records, 603 randomised participants) were included - three additional studies (five records) since our last review. Four studies compared more intensive versus less intensive insulin therapy; two studies compared dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to placebo; one study compared DPP-4 inhibitors to insulin glargine; one study compared sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to placebo; and two studies compared glitazones and insulin to insulin therapy alone. The majority of studies had an unclear to a high risk of bias. There were no studies examining the effects of biguanides, glinides, GLP-1 agonists, or sulphonylureas. Compared to less intensive insulin therapy, it is unclear if more intensive insulin therapy has an effect on transplant or graft survival (4 studies, 301

participants:

RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.94; I2 = 49%; very low certainty evidence), delayed graft function (2 studies, 153

participants:

RR 0.63, 0.42 to 0.93; I2 = 0%; very low certainty evidence), HbA1c (1 study, 16 participants; very low certainty evidence), fasting blood glucose (1 study, 24 participants; very low certainty evidence), kidney function markers (1 study, 26 participants; very low certainty evidence), death (any cause) (3 studies, 208 participants" RR 0.68, 0.29 to 1.58; I2 = 0%; very low certainty evidence), hypoglycaemia (4 studies, 301 participants; very low certainty evidence) and medication discontinuation due to adverse effects (1 study, 60 participants; very low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, it is unclear whether DPP-4 inhibitors have an effect on hypoglycaemia and medication discontinuation (2 studies, 51 participants; very low certainty evidence). However, DPP-4 inhibitors may reduce HbA1c and fasting blood glucose but not kidney function markers (1 study, 32 participants; low certainty evidence). Compared to insulin glargine, it is unclear if DPP-4 inhibitors have an effect on HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, hypoglycaemia or discontinuation due to adverse events (1 study, 45 participants; very low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably do not affect kidney graft survival (1 study, 44 participants; moderate certainty evidence), but may reduce HbA1c without affecting fasting blood glucose and eGFR long-term (1 study, 44 participants, low certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors probably do not increase hypoglycaemia, and probably have little or no effect on medication discontinuation due to adverse events. However, all participants discontinuing SGLT2 inhibitors had urinary tract infections (1 study, 44 participants, moderate certainty evidence). Compared to insulin therapy alone, it is unclear if glitazones added to insulin have an effect on HbA1c or kidney function markers (1 study, 62 participants; very low certainty evidence). However, glitazones may make little or no difference to fasting blood glucose (2 studies, 120 participants; low certainty evidence), and medication discontinuation due to adverse events (1 study, 62 participants; low certainty evidence). No studies of DPP-4 inhibitors, or glitazones reported effects on transplant or graft survival, delayed graft function or death (any cause). AUTHORS'

CONCLUSIONS:

The efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents in the treatment of pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients is questionable. Evidence from existing studies examining the effect of intensive insulin therapy, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT inhibitors and glitazones is mostly of low to very low certainty. Appropriately blinded, larger, and higher quality RCTs are needed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of contemporary glucose-lowering agents in the kidney transplant population.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Trasplante de Riñón / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV / Hipoglucemiantes Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Trasplante de Riñón / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV / Hipoglucemiantes Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia