Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tailored to Fit: How an Implementation Framework Can Support Pragmatic Pain Care Trial Adaptation for Diverse Veterans Affairs Clinical Settings.
Purcell, Natalie; Becker, William C; Zamora, Kara A; McGrath, Sarah L; Hagedorn, Hildi J; Fabian, Eva R; McCamish, Nicole; Seal, Karen H.
Afiliación
  • Purcell N; San Francisco VA Health Care System.
  • Becker WC; University of California, San Francisco, CA.
  • Zamora KA; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.
  • McGrath SL; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Hagedorn HJ; San Francisco VA Health Care System.
  • Fabian ER; University of California, San Francisco, CA.
  • McCamish N; San Francisco VA Health Care System.
  • Seal KH; Minneapolis VA Health Care System.
Med Care ; 58 Suppl 2 9S: S80-S87, 2020 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32826776
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Veterans Affairs (VA) has rolled out a holistic, multicomponent Whole Health care model nationwide, yet no pragmatic trials have been conducted in real-world clinical settings to compare its effectiveness against other evidence-based approaches for chronic pain management in veterans.

OBJECTIVES:

We describe the adaptation of the first large pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the Whole Health model for chronic pain care for diverse VA clinical settings. RESEARCH

DESIGN:

Informed by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Systems implementation framework, we conducted qualitative semistructured interviews to obtain feedback on trial design from VA leadership, frontline clinicians, and veterans with chronic pain at 5 VA enrollment sites. Next, we convened in-person evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) meetings with study stakeholders (including frontline clinicians and administrators) at each site to discuss study design; review interview themes; and identify site-specific barriers, facilitators, and approaches to implementation. Ethnographic observations from EBQI meetings provided additional insight into implementation strategies.

SUBJECTS:

Seventy-four veteran and VA staff stakeholders were interviewed; 71 stakeholders participated in EBQI meetings.

RESULTS:

At each site, unique clinical contexts and varying resources for Whole Health and pain care delivery affected plans for trial implementation. We present examples of local adaptations that emerged through the formative evaluation process to facilitate implementation and yield a more pragmatic trial design.

CONCLUSIONS:

A systematic formative evaluation can facilitate engagement and buy-in of study stakeholders. Locally tailored pragmatic implementation strategies may improve the likelihood of successful trial execution as well as future implementation of evidence-based pain care approaches in real-world clinical settings.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / United States Department of Veterans Affairs / Medicina Integrativa / Dolor Crónico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Care Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / United States Department of Veterans Affairs / Medicina Integrativa / Dolor Crónico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Care Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article