Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimating Trunk Angle Kinematics During Lifting Using a Computationally Efficient Computer Vision Method.
Greene, Runyu L; Lu, Ming-Lun; Barim, Menekse Salar; Wang, Xuan; Hayden, Marie; Hu, Yu Hen; Radwin, Robert G.
Afiliación
  • Greene RL; 5228 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Lu ML; 2510 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Ohio, USA.
  • Barim MS; 2510 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Ohio, USA.
  • Wang X; 5228 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Hayden M; 2510 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Ohio, USA.
  • Hu YH; 5228 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Radwin RG; 5228 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Hum Factors ; 64(3): 482-498, 2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972247
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

A computer vision method was developed for estimating the trunk flexion angle, angular speed, and angular acceleration by extracting simple features from the moving image during lifting.

BACKGROUND:

Trunk kinematics is an important risk factor for lower back pain, but is often difficult to measure by practitioners for lifting risk assessments.

METHODS:

Mannequins representing a wide range of hand locations for different lifting postures were systematically generated using the University of Michigan 3DSSPP software. A bounding box was drawn tightly around each mannequin and regression models estimated trunk angles. The estimates were validated against human posture data for 216 lifts collected using a laboratory-grade motion capture system and synchronized video recordings. Trunk kinematics, based on bounding box dimensions drawn around the subjects in the video recordings of the lifts, were modeled for consecutive video frames.

RESULTS:

The mean absolute difference between predicted and motion capture measured trunk angles was 14.7°, and there was a significant linear relationship between predicted and measured trunk angles (R2 = .80, p < .001). The training error for the kinematics model was 2.3°.

CONCLUSION:

Using simple computer vision-extracted features, the bounding box method indirectly estimated trunk angle and associated kinematics, albeit with limited precision. APPLICATION This computer vision method may be implemented on handheld devices such as smartphones to facilitate automatic lifting risk assessments in the workplace.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Elevación / Torso Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Hum Factors Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Elevación / Torso Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Hum Factors Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos