Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Linical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: a retrospective study.
Li, Hua; Ou, Yufu; Xie, Furong; Liang, Weiguo; Tian, Gang; Li, Hongyu.
Afiliación
  • Li H; Department of Spine Surgery, Guangxi Orthopedics and Traumatology Hospital, Nanning, China.
  • Ou Y; Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
  • Xie F; Department of Spine Surgery, Guangxi Orthopedics and Traumatology Hospital, Nanning, China.
  • Liang W; Department of Spine Surgery, Guangxi Orthopedics and Traumatology Hospital, Nanning, China.
  • Tian G; Department of Spine Surgery, Guangxi Orthopedics and Traumatology Hospital, Nanning, China.
  • Li H; Department of Spine Surgery, Guangxi Orthopedics and Traumatology Hospital, Nanning, China. ljy13639001068@126.com.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 15(1): 441, 2020 Sep 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972436
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is increasingly being used to treat lumbar degenerative disease, the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) involves considerable uncertainty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PELD for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients aged 65 years or older.

METHODS:

In this retrospective review, 136 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent PELD to treat LSS were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups, group A (ages 65-74) and group B (age ≥ 75), and perioperative data were analyzed. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and MacNab classification were used to evaluate postoperative clinical efficacy.

RESULTS:

All patients successfully underwent the operation with satisfactory treatment outcomes. Compared to preoperative scores, the self-reported scores or pain while performing daily activities were significantly improved in both treatment groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest, and postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). The overall postoperative complication rate was similar between the two groups. Moreover, no statistically significant differences in VAS-back pain scores, VAS-leg pain scores, JOA scores, and MacNab classification were found between the groups at the 3-month and 1.5-year follow-up examinations (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

PELD is safe and effective for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients. Age is not a contraindication for decompressive lumbar spine surgery. PELD has advantages such as reduced trauma, fewer anesthesia-related complications, and a fast postoperative recovery. Elderly patients should be considered good candidates for lumbar decompression surgery using minimally invasive techniques.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estenosis Espinal / Discectomía Percutánea / Endoscopía / Vértebras Lumbares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Surg Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estenosis Espinal / Discectomía Percutánea / Endoscopía / Vértebras Lumbares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Surg Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China