Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
International Medical Graduates are Comparable to American Medical Graduates as General Surgery Interns.
Rajesh, Aashish; Asaad, Malke; AlJamal, Yazan N; Azevedo, Rafael U; Stulak, John M; Heller, Stephanie F; Rivera, Mariela; Farley, David R.
Afiliación
  • Rajesh A; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Asaad M; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • AlJamal YN; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Azevedo RU; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Stulak JM; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Heller SF; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Rivera M; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Farley DR; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Farley.David@mayo.edu.
J Surg Res ; 258: 239-245, 2021 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33038601
BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) are often relegated to preliminary positions in general surgery (GS) owing to uncertainties about the candidate's performance in the American healthcare setting. We aimed to determine the comparative performance of IMGs and American medical graduates (AMGs) at baseline and assess these trends over the course of their GS internship. METHODS: Evaluations of all IMG preliminary and AMG categorical interns from 2013 to 2017 at our GS residency program were obtained from three faculty members to score overall performance, technical skills, interpersonal communication, and medical knowledge on a 10-point Likert scale. Scores on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam, an in-house preparation test, United States Medical Licensing Exam, and performance during the biannual multistation objective assessments were compared between the two resident groups. RESULTS: Seventy-two interns (28 [39%] AMG categorical and 44 [61%] IMG preliminary) met inclusion criteria. The AMG group had significantly higher median Step 1 and Step 2 scores compared with our IMG group (243 versus 231, P = 0.002, and 250 versus 246, P = 0.03, respectively).Although in-house preparation test scores were higher among IMGs (median [interquartile range] of 36 [33-40] among AMGs and 38 [34-45] among IMGs; P = 0.002), there were no statistically significant differences between the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores of the two groups. The median scores for the four faculty evaluation components were similar between the AMG (7, 8, 7, 7) and IMG resident groups (7, 7, 7, 7; P = nonsignificant). IMGs scored significantly higher in both biannual multistation objective assessments than AMGs (median [interquartile range] July: 59 [47-91] versus 55 [37-62], P = 0.005; January: 103 [86-116] versus 91 [87-104], P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: It is reassuring to confirm that no matter where they are from, great candidates can perform well as surgical interns in a GS training program.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cirugía General / Competencia Clínica / Médicos Graduados Extranjeros / Internado y Residencia Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cirugía General / Competencia Clínica / Médicos Graduados Extranjeros / Internado y Residencia Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article