Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and Neural Correlates of Reward and Relief Drinking.
Burnette, Elizabeth M; Grodin, Erica N; Schacht, Joseph P; Ray, Lara A.
Afiliación
  • Burnette EM; From the, Department of Psychology, (EMB, ENG, LAR), University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Grodin EN; Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, (EMB), University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Schacht JP; From the, Department of Psychology, (EMB, ENG, LAR), University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Ray LA; Department of Psychiatry, (JPS), University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 45(1): 194-203, 2021 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33119924
BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is heterogenous. One approach to parsing this heterogeneity is to phenotype individuals by their underlying motivation to drink, specifically drinking for reward (i.e., positive reinforcement) or for relief (i.e., negative reinforcement/normalizing). Reward- versus relief-motivated behavior is thought to be associated with a shift from ventral to dorsal striatal (DS) signaling. The present study examined whether reward and relief drinking were differentially associated with other clinical characteristics and with alcohol cue-elicited activation of the ventral and dorsal striatum. METHODS: Non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers (N = 184; 61 female, 123 male) completed the UCLA Reward, Relief, Habit Drinking Scale (RRHDS) and the Reasons for Heavy Drinking Questionnaire (RHDQ), to categorize drinking motivation. Measures of alcohol use, alcohol problems, mood, and craving were also collected. A subset of participants (N = 45; 17 female, 28 male) also completed a functional neuroimaging alcohol cue reactivity task. RESULTS: RRHDS-designated relief/habit drinkers scored lower than reward drinkers on the RHDQ Reinforcement subscale (p = 0.04) and higher on the RHDQ Normalizing subscale (p = 0.004). Relief/habit drinkers also demonstrated greater AUD severity on a host of clinical measures. Relief/habit drinkers displayed higher cue-elicited DS activation compared with reward drinkers (p = 0.04), while ventral striatal cue-elicited activation did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support and extend the differentiation of reward from relief/habit-motivated drinking and suggest that differences in DS response to conditioned alcohol cues may underlie this distinction. Elucidating neurobiological and clinical differences between these subtypes may facilitate treatment matching and precision medicine for AUD.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recompensa / Alcoholismo / Estriado Ventral / Motivación Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recompensa / Alcoholismo / Estriado Ventral / Motivación Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article