Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A meta-analysis of efficacy of topical steroids in eosinophilic esophagitis: From the perspective of histologic, clinical, and endoscopic outcome.
Hao, Li-Xiao; Lu, Yi; Li, Tao; Gong, Biao.
Afiliación
  • Hao LX; Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Shanghai Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, People's Republic of China.
  • Lu Y; Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, People's Republic of China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, People'
  • Li T; Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Shanghai Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, People's Republic of China.
  • Gong B; Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Shanghai Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: gbercp616@163.com.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 44(4): 251-260, 2021 Apr.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33162187
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Swallowed topical steroids are a mainstay drug therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), studies have demonstrated good histologic response, but with enormous discrepancy in clinical and endoscopic improvement. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of topical steroids in EoE in histological, clinical and endoscopic improvement.

METHODS:

Several databases were searched from inception to August 1, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical steroids with placebo for EoE in the short-term. The outcomes of interest mainly included basic characteristics of the studies, histologic, clinical, endoscopic response rate and adverse events. The results were pooled together using Reviewer Manager 5.3.5 software, and inconsistency was quantified using I2 statistics.

RESULTS:

Nine studies were eventually selected. The results showed that topical steroids were effective in inducing histologic response compared with placebo for both complete (OR 35.82, 95% CI 14.98-85.64, P<0.0001; I2=0, P=0.72) and partial response (OR 28.44, 95% CI 8.56-94.47, P<0.0001; I2=70%, P=0.0009). Moreover, topical steroids were useful in gaining clinical response (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.14-5.60, P=0.02; I2=60%, P=0.02) and endoscopic response (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.47-8.36, P=0.005; I2=0, P=0.57). Generally, topical steroids are well tolerated. The most common adverse events are infections and infestations (59 cases).

CONCLUSION:

Topical steroids were effective in inducing histological, clinical and endoscopic response in the short-term, and the adverse events were almost tolerable; however, we should interpret the result of clinical and endoscopic response with caution.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esofagitis Eosinofílica / Glucocorticoides Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Gastroenterol Hepatol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esofagitis Eosinofílica / Glucocorticoides Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Gastroenterol Hepatol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article