Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Le Fort I Distraction Enough to Treat Severe Midface Hypoplasia?
Goel, Pedram; Fahradyan, Artur; Wolfswinkel, Erik M; Jacob, Laya; Yen, Stephen L-K; Urata, Mark M; Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
Afiliación
  • Goel P; Keck School of Medicine of USC.
  • Fahradyan A; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC.
  • Wolfswinkel EM; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC.
  • Jacob L; Keck School of Medicine of USC.
  • Yen SL; Division of Dentistry and Orthodontics.
  • Urata MM; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC.
  • Hammoudeh JA; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(5): 1716-1720, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33464771
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In severe cases of maxillary hypoplasia, Le Fort I distraction may be required for treatment. This study describes our experience with internal distraction devices and assesses our outcomes in patients with a negative overjet on average >15 mm.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of patients with a history of cleft lip and/or palate who underwent Le Fort I distraction at our institution from 11/2007-11/2017 was performed. Data regarding demographics, procedural details and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS:

Twenty patients, 13 (65.0%) male and 7 (30.0%) female, were included. All (100%) patients had a history of cleft lip and/or palate and 2 (10.0%) of them had associated syndromes. All 20 patients underwent internal distraction. The average age at surgery was 17.8 years (range 15.2-20.7, SD 1.6 years). The average preoperative negative overjet was 19.27 mm (range 10-30, SD 5.63 mm). The mean total distraction length was 15.3 mm (range 0-30, SD 6.72 mm). There were no intraoperative complications, however, there were a total of 4 (20.0%) postoperative complications, 2 of which required reoperation due to device malfunction or displacement. 14 (70.0%) patients had repeat procedures to complete occlusal correction or correct relapse.

CONCLUSIONS:

Maxillary distraction alone was insufficient for correction of maxillary discrepancies averaging >15 mm. Instead, it's utility may be in positioning the maxilla for a more viable final advancement and fixation procedure, rather than being solely responsible for achieving normal occlusion during distraction.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Labio Leporino / Fisura del Paladar / Osteogénesis por Distracción Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Labio Leporino / Fisura del Paladar / Osteogénesis por Distracción Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article