Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of a New Botulinum Toxin (HU-014) Versus Existing Onabotulinumtoxin A in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.
Yoo, Kwang Ho; Lee, Yang Won; Lee, Ji Su; Kwon, Soon Hyo; Huh, Chang Hun; Kim, Beom Joon.
Afiliación
  • Yoo KH; Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee YW; Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee JS; Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kwon SH; Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea.
  • Huh CH; Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
  • Kim BJ; Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dermatol Surg ; 47(3): e91-e96, 2021 03 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33481449
BACKGROUND: Recently, the safety of a new botulinum toxin (HU-014) was confirmed through animal experiments. The evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this newly introduced botulinum toxin is required considering the risk of adverse events (AEs) and need for standardization before its universal use. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, active-controlled phase III clinical trial was to investigate the noninferiority of HU-014 versus existing onabotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. METHODS: In total, 267 subjects were randomized to either the test (HU-014) or control (onabotulinumtoxin A) group. At the baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16, investigator's live assessment, independent photographic assessment, subjects' improvement assessment, subjects' satisfaction assessment, and safety assessment were performed. RESULTS: At week 4, the response rate was 90.15% and 92.31% in the test and control groups, respectively, as per investigator's live assessment while frowning, without a significant difference. Both groups also showed no significant differences in response rates in the other assessments. In addition, no serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: HU-014 was noninferior to existing onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines at a 1:1 dose ratio, and both products were well tolerated.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Envejecimiento de la Piel / Técnicas Cosméticas / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Fármacos Neuromusculares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Surg Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Envejecimiento de la Piel / Técnicas Cosméticas / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Fármacos Neuromusculares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Surg Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article