Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CT and MRI Image Fusion Error: An Analysis of Co-Registration Error Using Commercially Available Deep Brain Stimulation Surgical Planning Software.
Burke, John F; Tanzillo, Dominic; Starr, Philip A; Lim, Daniel A; Larson, Paul S.
Afiliación
  • Burke JF; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA, john.burke@ucsf.edu.
  • Tanzillo D; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Starr PA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Lim DA; Surgical Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Larson PS; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 99(3): 196-202, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33535219
INTRODUCTION: During deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans need to be co-registered or fused. Image fusion is associated with the error that can distort the location of anatomical structures. Co-registration in DBS surgery is usually performed automatically by proprietary software; the amount of error during this process is not well understood. Here, our goal is to quantify the error during automated image co-registration with FrameLink™, a commonly used software for DBS planning and clinical research. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study at a quaternary care referral center, comparing CT and MR imaging co-registration for a consecutive series of patients over a 12-month period. We collected CT images and MRI scans for 22 patients with Parkinson's disease requiring placement of DBS. Anatomical landmarks were located on CT images and MRI scans using a novel image analysis algorithm that included a method for capturing the potential error inherent in the image standardization step of the analysis. The distance between the anatomical landmarks was measured, and the error was found by averaging the distances across all patients. RESULTS: The average error during co-registration was 1.25 mm. This error was significantly larger than the error resulting from image standardization (0.19 mm) and was worse in the anterior-posterior direction. CONCLUSIONS: The image fusion errors found in this analysis were nontrivial. Although the estimated error may be inflated, it is sig-nificant enough that users must be aware of this potential inaccuracy, and developers of proprietary software should provide details about the magnitude and direction of co-registration errors.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Encefálica Profunda Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Encefálica Profunda Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article