Relative and absolute reliability of somatosensory evoked potentials in response to non-noxious electrical stimulation of the paraspinal muscles in healthy participants at an interval of 3-months.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are used extensively to quantify cortical activity in response to noxious and/or non-noxious sensory stimuli. However, data demonstrating the reliability of SEP measures in response to non-noxious stimulation over time are scarce. AIM: We investigated the relative and absolute reliability, and the smallest detectable change at 95% confidence (SDC95) for SEPs evoked by non-noxious electrical stimulation of the paraspinal muscles in thirty-nine healthy participants at a 3-month interval. METHODS: SEPs were evoked at an intensity three-times that of each participant's perceptual threshold and recorded from a single electrode placed over the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). RESULTS: Our analyses reveal that i) latency, as a measure of activity onset, has poor relative reliability but good absolute reliability; ii) area, as a measure of cortical activity, has good relative and absolute reliability (except for the N150 component) and iii) perceptual threshold and stimulation intensity was not reliable over time. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the area of the N80 and P260 SEP components, and the area of the N80-N150-P260 SEP complex, can be utilised in future studies as reliable markers of cortical activity.