Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing the Efficacy of Multidisciplinary Assessment and Treatment, or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, with Treatment as Usual on Health Outcomes in Women on Long-Term Sick Leave-A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Finnes, Anna; Anderzén, Ingrid; Pingel, Ronnie; Dahl, JoAnne; Molin, Linnea; Lytsy, Per.
Afiliación
  • Finnes A; Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 9, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden.
  • Anderzén I; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, SE-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Pingel R; Department of Statistics, Uppsala University, Kyrkogårdsgatan 10, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Dahl J; Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Campus Blåsenhus, von Kraemers allé 1A, SE-751 42 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Molin L; Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Lytsy P; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, SE-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33670235
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chronic pain and mental disorders are common reasons for long term sick leave. The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a multidisciplinary assessment and treatment program including acceptance and commitment therapy (TEAM) and stand-alone acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), compared with treatment as usual (Control) on health outcomes in women on long-term sick leave.

METHOD:

Participants (n = 308), women of working age on long term sick leave due to musculoskeletal pain and/or common mental disorders, were randomized to TEAM (n = 102), ACT (n = 102) or Control (n = 104). Participants in the multidisciplinary assessment treatment program received ACT, but also medical assessment, occupational therapy and social counselling. The second intervention included ACT only. Health outcomes were assessed over 12 months using adjusted linear mixed models. The results showed significant interaction effects for both ACT and TEAM compared with Control in anxiety (ACT [p < 0.05]; TEAM [p < 0.001]), depression (ACT [p < 0.001]; TEAM [p < 0.001]) and general well-being (ACT [p < 0.05]; TEAM [p < 0.001]). For self-rated pain, there was a significant interaction effect in favour of ACT (p < 0.05), and for satisfaction with life in favour of TEAM (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Both ACT alone and multidisciplinary assessment and treatment including ACT were superior to treatment as usual in clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia