Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resilience and ongoing quality care for cancer clinical trials during COVID-19: Experience from a tertiary hospital in Australia.
Ives, Amy; Pusztai, Tricia; Keller, Jacqui; Ahern, Elizabeth; Chan, Bryan; Gasper, Harry; Wyld, David; Kennedy, Glen; Dickie, Graeme; Lwin, Zarnie; Roberts, Natasha A.
Afiliación
  • Ives A; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Pusztai T; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Keller J; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Ahern E; Department of Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Chan B; School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gasper H; Adem Crosby Cancer Centre, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.
  • Wyld D; School of Medicine, Griffith University, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Kennedy G; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Dickie G; Clinical School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
  • Lwin Z; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Roberts NA; Clinical School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol ; 18(2): e141-e147, 2022 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33819387
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced rapid system-wide changes to be implemented within cancer care at an alarming pace. Clinical trials are a key element of comprehensive cancer care. Ensuring the continuing safe conduct of cancer clinical trials in the context of a pandemic is challenging. METHODS: We aimed to describe the COVID-19 pandemic response of a Cancer Care Clinical Research Unit (CRU) of a tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia. We used a mixed methods approach for this case study. Emailed directives from CRU managers to all CRU staff sharing were qualitatively analysed and mapped against our unit activities over longitudinal time points. Data from patient recruitment and protocol deviations were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Mapping activity from 11 March to 30 September 2020 revealed rapid change during the first 2 weeks. Four key strategies to accommodate change were identified: supporting patients and families, introduction of telehealth, accessing investigational product, and social distancing. Early in the pandemic we recognised that our core key stakeholders were integral to our response. When compared to the previous 12 months, our recruitment numbers dropped markedly in early phases of the response but recovered over time, as we accommodated internal and external impacts. CONCLUSION: Our experience of agility as a necessity, adapting to support patients, and managing both clinical research activity and sponsors during the height of the pandemic response is presented here in order to inform future disaster response planning by clinical trial organisations.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia