Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Left femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation: patient characteristics and outcomes.
Jelisejevas, Julius; Breitenstein, Alexander; Hofer, Daniel; Winnik, Stephan; Steffel, Jan; Saguner, Ardan M.
Afiliación
  • Jelisejevas J; Electrophysiology Division, Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Breitenstein A; Electrophysiology Division, Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hofer D; Electrophysiology Division, Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Winnik S; Electrophysiology Division, Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Steffel J; Electrophysiology Division, Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Saguner AM; Electrophysiology Division, Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Europace ; 23(9): 1456-1461, 2021 09 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33822918
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Leadless pacing has become an alternative approach for patients requiring a single-chamber pacemaker. Conventionally, leadless Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (TPS) pacemakers are implanted via a right femoral venous access. However, due to various reasons, a left-sided femoral venous approach may be necessary. We hypothesized that a left-sided femoral venous approach is as safe and effective when compared with a right-sided approach. We assessed indications, procedural characteristics, safety and mid-term outcomes of Micra TPS implantation via a left femoral venous approach when compared with the conventional right-sided approach. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

In this retrospective single-centre analysis, 143 consecutive patients undergoing Micra TPS implantation were included. 87% (125/143) underwent Micra TPS implantation via a right, and 13% (18/143) via a left femoral venous access. The mean age at implantation was 79.8 ± 7.5 years. Acute procedural success, mean procedure and fluoroscopy times as well as device parameters at implantation and follow-up (mean 15 ± 11.5 months) were similar between the two groups. Five major complications (3.5%) were encountered, all using a right-sided approach. After a transfemoral TAVI procedure, left femoral venous access was used in 42% of cases when compared with 8% in the remaining population (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS:

A left femoral venous access for Micra TPS implantation is safe and effective with an excellent implantation success rate similar to a conventional right femoral venous access without longer implantation and fluoroscopy times. The most frequent reason for choosing left vs. right femoral venous access was a previous transfemoral TAVI procedure.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Europace Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Europace Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza