Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosing necrotizing external otitis on CT and MRI: assessment of pattern of extension.
van der Meer, Wilhelmina L; Waterval, Jérôme J; Kunst, Henricus P M; Mitea, Cristina; Pegge, Sjoert A H; Postma, Alida A.
Afiliación
  • van der Meer WL; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. lieke.vander.meer@mumc.nl.
  • Waterval JJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Kunst HPM; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Mitea C; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Pegge SAH; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Postma AA; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(3): 1323-1328, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33895893
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Necrotizing external otitis (NEO) is a serious complication of external otitis. NEO can be classified according to-anterior, medial, posterior, intracranial, and contralateral-extension patterns. Currently there is no consensus on the optimal imaging modality for the identification of disease extension. This study compares NEO extension patterns on MR and CT to evaluate diagnostic comparability.

METHODS:

Patients who received a CT and MR within a 3-month interval were retrospectively examined. Involvement of subsites and subsequent spreading patterns were assessed on both modalities by a radiologist in training and by a senior head and neck radiologist. The prevalence of extension patterns on CT and MR were calculated and compared.

RESULTS:

All 21 included NEO cases showed an anterior extension pattern on CT and MR. Contrary to MR, medial extension was not recognized on CT in two out of six patients, and intracranial extension in five out of eight patients. The posterior extension pattern was not recognized on MR. Overall, single anterior extension pattern (62%) is more prevalent than multiple extension patterns (38%).

CONCLUSION:

All anterior NEO extension pattern were identified on CT as well as MR. However, the medial and intracranial spreading patterns as seen on MR could only be identified on CT in a small number of patients. The posterior spreading pattern can be overlooked on MR. Thus, CT and MR are complimentary for the initial diagnosis and work-up of NEO as to correctly delineate disease extent through the skull base.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Otitis Externa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Otitis Externa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos