Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishing and Facilitating Large-Scale Manuscript Collaborations via Social Media: Novel Method and Tools for Replication.
Acquaviva, Kimberly D.
Afiliación
  • Acquaviva KD; School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(5): e25077, 2021 05 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33999002
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Authorship teams in the health professions are typically composed of scholars who are acquainted with one another before a manuscript is written. Even if a scholar has identified a diverse group of collaborators outside their usual network, writing an article with a large number of co-authors poses significant logistical challenges.

OBJECTIVE:

This paper describes a novel method for establishing and facilitating large-scale manuscript collaborations via social media.

METHODS:

On September 11, 2020, I used the social media platform Twitter to invite people to collaborate on an article I had drafted. Anyone who wanted to collaborate was welcome, regardless of discipline, specialty, title, country of residence, or degree completion. During the 25 days that followed, I used Google Docs, Google Sheets, and Google Forms to manage all aspects of the collaboration.

RESULTS:

The collaboration resulted in the completion of 2 manuscripts in a 25-day period. The International Council of Medical Journal Editors authorship criteria were met by 40 collaborators for the first article ("Documenting Social Media Engagement as Scholarship A New Model for Assessing Academic Accomplishment for the Health Professions") and 35 collaborators for the second article ("The Benefits of Using Social Media as a Health Professional in Academia"). The authorship teams for both articles were notably diverse, with 17%-18% (7/40 and 6/35, respectively) of authors identifying as a person of color and/or underrepresented minority, 37%-38% (15/40 and 13/35, respectively) identifying as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, gender non-conforming, queer and/or questioning), 73%-74% (29/40 and 26/35, respectively) using she/her pronouns, and 20%-23% (9/40 and 7/35, respectively) identifying as a person with a disability.

CONCLUSIONS:

Scholars in the health professions can use this paper in conjunction with the tools provided to replicate this process in carrying out their own large-scale manuscript collaborations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medios de Comunicación Sociales / Personas Transgénero / Minorías Sexuales y de Género Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Internet Res Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medios de Comunicación Sociales / Personas Transgénero / Minorías Sexuales y de Género Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Internet Res Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos