Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Nonviable Probiotic in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study.
Mack, Isabelle; Schwille-Kiuntke, Juliane; Mazurak, Nazar; Niesler, Beate; Zimmermann, Kurt; Mönnikes, Hubert; Enck, Paul.
Afiliación
  • Mack I; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen.
  • Schwille-Kiuntke J; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen; Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen.
  • Mazurak N; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen.
  • Niesler B; Department of Human Molecular Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
  • Zimmermann K; SymbioPharm GmbH, Herborn.
  • Mönnikes H; Department of Internal Medicine, Martin Luther Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
  • Enck P; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen. Electronic address: paul.enck@uni-tuebingen.de.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(5): 1039-1047.e9, 2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34214682
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of oral treatment with a nonviable probiotic lysate (BL) of Escherichia coli (DSM 17252) and Enterococcus faecalis (DSM 16440) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

METHODS:

A phase IV, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (30 study sites), parallel group study was conducted in 389 patients of both sexes with IBS according to Rome III criteria. The treatment period was 26 weeks. The participants were allocated to either placebo or BL after a 2-week baseline period. The primary outcome was based on the European Medicines Agency IBS guideline improvement in global assessment (GAI) and improvement in abdominal pain.

RESULTS:

Patients (BL, n = 191; placebo, n = 198) had similar baseline values and dropout rates. Overall, the response was similar between BL and placebo for IBS-GAI (17.4% and 14.4%, respectively; P = ·4787) and abdominal pain (42.0% and 35.4%, respectively; P = ·1419). Some secondary outcome measures and sensitivity analyses pointed toward potentially higher sensitivity of the abdominal pain measures in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) but not the other subtypes. For the GAI, no subgroup differences were detected. For IBS-D, post hoc analyses for abdominal pain response over time and stool consistency showed potentially promising effects of BL. Finally, the treatment with BL was well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS:

BL is not effective across all IBS subtypes. However, BL may offer a treatment option for IBS-D that needs verification by an adequately powered drug trial; EudraCT-No. 2012-002741-38.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Probióticos / Síndrome del Colon Irritable Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Probióticos / Síndrome del Colon Irritable Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article